Monthly Archives: November 2016

REMOVE YOUR PRIVATE INFORMATION FROM THE INTERNET WITH A PRIVACY SERVICE

 
 
 
 

Did you know that your voter registration information is considered a public record? Your personal information like your first and last name, home address, date of birth, party affiliation and date of voting is being sold to the highest bidder and being resold by many online “data brokers”.

Websites like Spokeo.com, Intelius.com, and Peoplefinders.com (and many more), are constantly buying and selling your personal information and putting it on display online for anyone to see, all with a simple Google search of your name and geographical location.

Finally, election season is over (phew), and DeleteMe is here to help give you peace of mind after a few stressful weeks.

Thanks,

The DeleteMe Team | 1-800-928-1987 | deleteme@getabine.com

Abine Inc. – The Online Privacy Company
PO Box 410009, Cambridge, MA 02141

 

Andrew Breitbart tweet before death(Murder?) adds fuel to online speculation of D.C. sex-trafficking ring

Andrew Breitbart tweet before death adds fuel to online speculation of D.C. sex-trafficking ring

Newspapers, pundits blast charges from ‘dark crevices of the Web’

Recommended

Question of the Day

Will Americans ever trust pollsters again?

Question of the Day

  Yes
  No
  Not sure

Search Yellow Pages

Conservative media icon Andrew Breitbart. (Associated Press) ** FILE **
Conservative media icon Andrew Breitbart. (Associated Press) ** FILE ** more >
 
– The Washington Times – Monday, November 28, 2016

Andrew Breitbart is making news even in death.

Social media speculation of a sex-trafficking ring in the nation’s capital has burned up social media sites for weeks. Complicating matters is Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta’s decision not to comment on anything WikiLeaks-related for months.

Explosive claims by Internet sleuths, which were prompted after reading stolen documents belonging to Mr. Podesta, have been derided as “viciously phony” by Fox News’ Howard Kurtz. A tweet by Mr. Breitbart shortly before his March 1, 2012, death is now being cited by online researchers as proof that they are onto something big.

“How prog-guru John Podesta isn’t household name as world class underage sex slave op cover-upperer defending unspeakable dregs escapes me,” Mr. Breitbart wrote Feb. 4, 2011.

The conservative icon’s death at age 43 was attributed to “heart failure.”

Knowledge of the late conservative’s tweet sent Google searches for “Andrew Breitbart” skyrocketing Sunday night as news spread to members of Twitter, Reddit, GAB, Voat and other social media platforms.

“One of America’s best an most respected independent journalists at the time; he is making a very bold claim about John Podesta — back then — based on his own research,” former Huffington Post contributor David Seaman wrote on GAB Sunday night. “This is years before WikiLeaks came out.”

Mr. Seaman and others claim Mr. Podesta and his associates spoke in code in numerous documents released by WikiLeaks. One example includes a Feb. 9, 2014, email with the subject line “Did you leave a handkerchief.”

“Hi John, The realtor found a handkerchief (I think it has a map that seems pizza-related. Is it yorus [sic]?” a woman identified as Susaner asked. “They can send it if you want.”

Such wording led online sleuths to investigate Mr. Podesta’s connections with D.C. power-player James Alefantis, owner of Comet Ping Pong. The Democrat fundraiser and pizza place owner, who is mentioned in 16 different WikiLeaks documents, had a public Instagram account that featured sexual innuendo and bizarre images of children.

Accounts for Comet Ping Pong employees, which are now set to private, featured nudity involving men with slices of pizza strategically placed over their genitals.

“From this insane, fabricated conspiracy theory, we’ve come under constant assault,” Mr. Alefantis, 42, told The New York Times on Nov. 21. “I’ve done nothing for days but try to clean this up and protect my staff and friends from being terrorized. […] It’s endless.”

The editorial board of The Washington Post also lambasted social media sleuths on Nov. 25 in an op-ed titled “‘Pizzagate’ shows how fake news hurts real people.”

“The allegations against Comet Ping Pong, reported by the New York Times, are absurd on their face and detached from any gossamer thread of fact,” the newspaper wrote. “They took root in the dark crevices of the Web and took flight thanks to social media platforms, whose witless ‘who, us?’ posture in the face of misinformation and outright lunacy is a civic embarrassment. …”

“Like 93 percent of Washingtonians, the restaurateur happened to support Ms. Clinton for president; he has some prominent Democratic friends, past and present,” the Post continued. “Mr. Alefantis’s name surfaced in leaked email from Mr. Podesta’s account, published by WikiLeaks, in which the two men discussed holding a Clinton fundraiser. As far as anyone knows, there is no more logic than that as to why Mr. Alefantis and his restaurant became targets. The First Amendment is a bulwark of democracy but provides no protection for defamatory allegations published in knowing disregard for the truth. Mr. Alefantis is more than entitled to sue for defamation and libel, if he can find the purveyors of the garbage heaved his way.”

Your tablet controlled “Smart Home” can be hacked into in 10 seconds by anybody

Any 14 year old kid, ex-lover, neighbor, local gangster, rapist or creep can be inside your home, in-person, or electronically, instantly.

If you are showing off your “web-enabled” home with a room full of gadgets and touchscreens all over your home, you are actually showing the world that your builders are clueless.

When ‘Smart Homes’ Get Hacked: I …

Jul 25, 2013 · “I can see all of the devices in your home and I think I can control them,” I said to Thomas Hatley, a complete stranger in Oregon who I had rudely …

bing yahoo cached proxied

 

7 ways to keep your smart home from being hacked – MarketWatch

Oct 20, 2016 … A smart door can be unlocked remotely with no signs of forced entry, cameras can be hacked and homes monitored without user knowledge, …

 

Philips Hue LED smart lights hacked, home

This post’s title says that Hue lights have been hacked, which I think is awfully inflated compared to what the security researcher was actually able to do …

bing yahoo cached proxied

 

How secure is your home automation? – …

Oct 26, 2016 · How hackable are your smart home gadgets? After last week’s massive internet outage, now may be the time for a full audit of your smart home devices.

bing yahoo cached proxied

 

 

Hacking into homes: ‘Smart home‘ security flaws found in popular …

May 2, 2016 … Hacking into homes: ‘Smart home‘ security flaws found in popular system … control of the connected devices in your home to someone you don’t trust and … SmartThings’ app store, where third-party developers can contribute …

 

Hello, Dave. I control your thermostat. …

Aug 09, 2014 · The immortal words of Hal, the rogue computer in 2001: A Space Odyssey, showed up on the display of a Google Nest appliance control system. That’s not …

bing yahoo cached proxied

 

How hackers are making your smart home safer | TechRadar

May 31, 2016 … The following year it was Nest’s turn, with a 15-second hack turning the … Could somebody access your smart home system or your personal … If it’s on your network, it can be exploited by hackers to compromise that network …

 

Your Hackable House – CNNMoney

Hackers have found security flaws in most connected devices inside your home. … Roll over the items in blue to see how they could make your house feel haunted. … Nope, it’s just hacked. … conference are able to turn on the camera in your smart TV, without you ever knowing. … Tony Blair says Brexit can be stopped …

 

4 Ways Your Smart Home Can Be Hacked > ENGINEERING.com

May 3, 2016 … Researchers used security loopholes to conduct cyber-attacks on an experimental Smart Home network.

 

 

How to Hack-Proof Your Smart Home | This Old House

“Anything that’s always connected, always sending data—that’s something a nearby attacker can latch on to,” says Craig Young, senior security researcher at the …

 

Smart home hacking is easier than you think – Network World.com

Apr 2, 2015 … Internet of Things hack security smart home. Related. Smart home tablet. How to keep your connected home safe: 7 steps you can take to boost …

 

Your smart home devices can easily be hacked – CBS News

Feb 13, 2015 … The “smarthome may not be quite as clever as you think. With the arrival of the so-called Internet of things — where household items such as …

 

 

 

Flaws in Samsung’s ‘SmartHome Let Hackers Unlock Doors and …

May 2, 2016 … The nightmare scenario of the internet-connected smart home is real. … “The worst case scenario is that an attacker can enter your home at any …. Hacker Lexicon: A Guide to Ransomware, the Scary Hack That’s on the Rise.

 

 

Facebook Employees Are Quitting Because Users Are Being Censored

Facebook Employees Are Quitting Because Users Are Being Censored

Submitted by Jake Anderson via TheAntiMedia.org,

The war on “fake news” embarked upon by Facebook, Google, and Twitter may be earning the media goliaths brownie points with establishment politicos, but users — and even employees — aren’t feeling as enthusiastic.

In the midst of backlash over the stunning victory of President-elect Donald Trump, which some people attribute to the preponderance of apocryphal headlines disseminated by Internet search engines and social media platforms, the companies are tweaking their algorithms in order to target specifically blacklisted sites, many of which happen to be alternative media sites that question the political and media establishment. Many of the sites are also financially dependent on ad revenue earned by organic and referral traffic directed by Google, Facebook, and Twitter.

Now, it appears Facebook’s new algorithmic censorship practices are causing some of its employees to quit. According to the New York Times, three current and former anonymous employees claim the company has had a new tool developed specifically to restrict certain kinds of posts from appearing in users’ news feeds in certain geographic areas. This form of censorship has been deployed under the auspices of facilitating Facebook’s entry into the Chinese market. Previously, the company did this in Pakistan, Russia, and Turkey, where the respective governments requested the ability for third parties to review and block posted content. Facebook granted the requests and removed approximately 55,000 total pieces of content.

The suppression software has been contentious within Facebook, which is separately grappling with what should or should not be shown to its users after the American presidential election’s unexpected outcome spurred questions over fake news on the social network.

 

Several employees who were working on the project have left Facebook after expressing misgivings about it, according to the current and former employees.

 

 

Over the summer, several Facebook employees who were working on the suppression tool left the company, the current and former employees said. Internally, so many employees asked about the project and its ambitions on an internal forum that, in July, it became a topic at one of Facebook’s weekly Friday afternoon question-and-answer sessions.

Now Facebook wants access to 1.4 billion people in the world’s second-largest economy, China, and they are willing to adhere to draconian censorship practices in order to do so. It could be a complete coincidence that this new push happens to coincide with Facebook’s crackdown on alternative media, which has caused several employees to tender their resignations.

A Facebook spokeswoman responded to the report in a statement:

“We have long said that we are interested in China, and are spending time understanding and learning more about the country. However, we have not made any decision on our approach to China. Our focus right now is on helping Chinese businesses and developers expand to new markets outside China by using our ad platform.”

The question now is whether there is a connection between two different but simultaneous pushes for censorship by the largest social media platform in the world.

Internet Dating has decscended into a “Whore/Master” competition study finds

We now date six people at once, study claims

 

And then we just ghost them when we’ve lost interest

 

 

 

Any young person who’s tried to explain the concept of “seeing” someone to their parents will be able to testify that the dating arena has changed enormously over the past couple of decades.

 

It’s no longer as simple as going for dinner and a movie and instantly becoming boyfriend and girlfriend – we “see” people, often more than one at a time.

 

The extent of this trend has been revealed in a new study which claims it’s now normal to date an incredible six people at once.

 

Money problems main reason for relationship breakdown

 

Read more

 

 

Assuming the average person isn’t out on a date every night of the week, we can also infer that two dates with the same person must be pretty spread-out too. 

 

The results of the study, carried out by eHarmony Australia, reinforce the idea that in today’s dating society, people are loath to commit to one person, seemingly always wanting to keep their options open.

 

And although there seems to be a new dating tactic arising every week – have you been benched, breadcrumbed or unghosted of late? – it seems the trend for ghosting, where you simply stop replying to a potential suitor’s messages and inexplicably disappear, is still going strong.

 

The researchers found that over the past year, 64 per cent of singletons have been ghosted by a date. But there’s a good chance a lot of those aren’t perfect either, with 51 per cent of those studies admitting to ghosting someone themselves.

 

Festivals of love around the world

 

 

Although considered by some to be rude and inconsiderate, the allure of ghosting is the opportunity to avoid having to explain why you’ve lost interest in someone and just hope they’ll work it out themselves.

 

Couples meeting on dating apps is the norm now, but could it be that knowing there are always more potential love interests just a swipe away is leaving us spoilt for choice and confused? 

 

“The research here and around the world shows there is a lot of dissatisfaction in the outcomes of many dating apps,” Nicole McInnes, Director of eHarmony Australia, told Cosmopolitan.

 

But with new apps launching all the time, it doesn’t look like a dating app backlash is going to happen any time soon. So, best start lining up your next six dates then.

 

 

 

In the San Francisco and New York online dating scene woman have become “free dinner whores” and men move up in the dating hierarchy depending on the size of their house and how much money they spend on dates.

 

It’s Cheating – infidelity in the digital age

 

“Infidelity is simply defined as the breaking of trust and the keeping of secrets in an intimate partnership.” — Rob Weiss … Infidelity ‘Only’ Online No Less Painful.

 

cached proxied

 

http://www.itscheating.com/

 

Is Online Infidelity Really Infidelity? | Psychology Today

 

. behaviour. Sexual infidelity online is no threat to a male’s certainty of paternity. … What to Say (and Not to) in a First Online Dating Message.

 

cached proxied

 

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/l%5B…%5Dis-online-infidelity-really-infidelity

 

Online Infidelity – CBN.com

 

Consider that online dating website are flourishing, offering a new, easy and quick way to meet your future mate—whether or not you’re already married.

 

cached proxied

 

http://www.cbn.com/family/familyadvice/Hawkins_Online.aspx

 

Cheating Online: Is Infidelity Easier On The Internet? – Huffington Post

 

… Does the internet make infidelity easier? That’s the question recovery.org, a site that helps …

 

cached proxied

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/14/cheating-online_n_3758148.html

 

The Shocking Reason Married Men REALLY Visit Infidelity Site | Dr …

 

… I recently went on the “cheating” dating site Ashley Madison while gathering information for my eBook on online dating. And wow—what an …

 

cached proxied

 

http://www.yourtango.com/experts/anne-%5B…%5Ding-cheating-adultery-infidelity-sites

 

‘Online infidelity can be addictive’, says new study | The Independent

 

. Research finds cheaters believe the internet has made infidelity … e.g. cybersex, exchanging sexual self-images, online flirting and dating).

 

cached proxied

 

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-styl%5B…%5Dfrom-the-open-university-a6705391.html

 

Affair Dating Sites: Best Extramarital Sites & Scams Exposed

 

There’s absolutely no question it’s best to meet someone online. It’s more discreet and you’re less likely to be caught. Plus, it’s much easier to meet someone …

 

cached proxied

 

http://haveanaffairguide.com/affair-dating-sites/

 

Are internet affairs different? – American Psychological Association

 

The typical affair used to start in the office and move to a seedy motel room, but the vast reach of the Internet has brought infidelity into many couples’ homes …

 

cached proxied

 

http://www.apa.org/monitor/2011/03/internet.aspx

 

 

 

Trump Administration backers call for boycott of the advertisers of “The Biggest Liars in the News Industry”

Trump Administration backers call for boycott of the advertisers of “The Biggest Liars in the News Industry”

 

 

 

By Susan Constini

 

 

 

The Trump Administration operatives have documented each and every lie that a Cartel of news and Silicon Valley organizations collaborated on to pitch to the public. The operatives claim to have emails and communications which prove that the faking of news story angles was coordinated and conflicted with the true facts that non-Cartel news reported. The targeted publications charged with rigging the news include:

 

 

 

  • CNN

  • NBC/MSNBC

  • The New York Times

  • The Washington Post

  • The Los Angeles Times

  • Twitter

  • Google

  • Linkedin

  • Facebook

  • The New Yorker

  • Salon

  • Cracked

  • WIRED

  • Ars Technica

  • Vox

  • The Verge

  • TechCrunch

  • All Disney Properties

  • Gizmodo

  • Kotaku

  • All Sony Properties

  • LifeHacker

  • Jezebel

  • All William Hearst properties

  • San Jose Mercury News

  • Deadspin

  • Jalopnik

  • Reddit.com

  • The Daily Dot

  • The Huffington Post

  • San Francisco Chronicle

  • MediaMatters

  • Politico

  • PolitiFact

  • ValueWalk

  • New York Daily News

  • TIME

  • Newsweek

  • Snopes

  • Motley Fool

  • Think Progress

  • The Guardian

  • The Telegraph

 

The Weird Twisted World of the #PizzaGate Sex Scandal

Nancy Pelosi Ensnared By #PizzaGate Sex And Payola Scandal

 

 

featured sub /v/pizzagate: #Pizzagate: Investigating corruption, child trafficking and abuse uncovered in the wikileaks podesta emails.

 

 

 

Guccifer 2.0: Is Nancy Pelosi’s Goat Hill Pizza Restaurant A Front Company Used To Funnel Money To The Democrats?

 

 

 

ShareTweet

 

 

The latest Guccifer 2.0 leaks reveal that Nanci Pelosi’s email account which is registered with Goat Hill Pizza, which has made numerous donations to the Democratic Party.

 

The Guccifer leak had her credentials to log into a campaign website and after doing a password reset on her account, sources say the email address said it was sent to a @goathill.com email.

 

 

On page two of the document ‘Certified List Of Elected Candidates For The November 2, 2004 General Election’ Nancy Pelosi’s email is listed as ‘PHILIP@GOATHILL.COM’.

 

 

The owner of Goat Hill Pizza is Philip DeAndrade.

 

 

He was a former staff member of Nanci Pelosi as recently as 2013 which can be found in the document ‘NP STAFF LIST UPDATED.xlsx’.

 

His email is ‘philip@goathill.com’.

 

Goat Hill Pizza on Potrero Hill Democratic Club’s website links to the donations:

 

 

 

Nanci Pelosi has used Foursquare to check into Goat Hill Pizza.

 

 

Goat Hill Pizza is owned by Goat Hill Inc.

 

People have pointed out Goat Hill Pizza’s Whois Guard is registered in Panama. This is common security and it is normal for websites to have their information hidden this way.

 

 

Goat Hill Pizza is now part of the Jobs Now! Wage Subsidy Program which makes the claim:

 

JobsNOW! offers Bay Area businesses a wage reimbursement to incentivize the hiring of eligible San Francisco job seekers and to help them grow their business.

 

Proof of their involvement (WARNING: Site automatically downloads a .doc file with employers listed)

 

Check out the JobsNOW! Wage Subsidy benefits:

 

As a Wage Subsidy employer, companies will be eligible to receive the following:

 

a) For positions that offer an eligible employee compensation at $13.50 an hour or greater, HSA will reimburse employer:

 

  • 100% of wages paid for 1st month

  • 75% of wages paid for the 2nd month

  • $1,000 a month for the remaining 3 months, assuming wages paid exceed $1,000 in the month.

  • Employees MUST work a minimum of 25 hours a week to be eligible for the reimbursement.

  • Note: HSA will reimburse for wages ONLY up to $35 an hour.  Wages paid in excess of $35 an hour are the sole responsibility of the employer.

 

b) For positions that offer employee compensation at less $13.50 an hour, HSA will reimburse employers an amount not to exceed $5,000 for each eligible employee hired:

 

  • The reimbursement will be paid in monthly installments not to exceed $1,000, for a period not to exceed 6-months.

  • Wages paid in excess of $1,000 in each calendar month are the sole responsibility of the Employer.

  • Employees MUST work a minimum of 25 hours a week to be eligible for the reimbursement.

 

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/5cptf0/nancy_pelosi_linked_to_pizzagate/

 

 

 

www.GoatHill.com – Nancy Pelosi Possibly Involved in Another …

 

9 hours ago … If you want to discuss the rules, go here – https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/ … Democrat Party leader Nancy Pelosi has links to another suspected …

 

google cached proxied

 

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1442209

 

SF’s Goat Hill Pizza is a front company for Nancy Pelosi | pizzagate

 

Nov 13, 2016 … SF’s Goat Hill Pizza is a front company for Nancy Pelosi (v/pizzagate) … http:// magafeed.com/guccifer-2-0-nancy-pelosis-goat-hill-pizza-may-be …

 

google cached proxied

 

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1438706

 

nancy pelosi may be using san francisco’s goat hill pizza to hide …

 

13 hours ago … Guccifer 2.0: Is Nancy Pelosi’s Goat Hill Pizza Restaurant A Front … FRANCISCO’S GOAT HILL PIZZA TO HIDE PIZZAGATE CRONY CASH …

 

google cached proxied

 

http://investigation1.net/nancy-pelosi%5B…%5Dll-pizza-to-hide-pizzagate-crony-cash/

 

 

 

DIRECTLY AROUND THE CORNER FROM GOAT HILL PIZZA IS THE MEETING SITE FOR THE SAN FRANCISCO PIZZAGATE GROUP: ONLY NANCY PELOSI HAD THE POLITICAL CLOUT TO COMMANDER A CITY PUBLIC LIBRARY FOR TWISTED SEX CLUB MEETINGS. OVER 30 SUSPECTED SEX RING MEMBERS LIVE ON SAN FRANCISCO’S POTRERO HILL:

 

 

 

 

 

 

San Francisco Public Library & NAMBLA

 

“The Portrero Hill branch of the San Francisco Public Library on a Saturday afternoon: … And upstairs … the regular monthly meeting of NAMBLA, the North American Man-Boy Love Association. This is … Potrero Parents Plan Protest at Library.

 

google cached proxied

 

http://www2.hawaii.edu/~donnab/lis610/SFPL_v_NAMBLA_sp12.ppt

 

“Pedophile Meetings Embroil SFPL in Controversy” by Flagg …

 

… San Francisco Public Library branch recently created headlines and aroused outrage … American Man-Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) were divulged in a Jan. … two days later some 50 area residents showed up at the Potrero Hill branch …

 

google cached proxied

 

https://www.questia.com/magazine/1G1-1%5B…%5De-meetings-embroil-sfpl-in-controversy

 

Parents Demand San Francisco Library Oust Pedophile Group

 

Jan 16, 1992 … SAN FRANCISCO (AP) _ For two years, members of the North … turned out at the Potrero Hill branch library, demanding the group’s ouster. … ”We can’t really attack the organization NAMBLA because the organization isn’t molesting children, it’s the individuals. … It’s a public open space,” Schneider said.

 

google cached proxied

 

http://www.apnewsarchive.com/1992/Pare%5B…%5Dup/id-d0fa3317cd9cea4693584d88ad814ba9

 

Potrero :: San Francisco Public Library

 

The collection was started in 1986 to record oral histories of Potrero Hill residents and gather old photographs of the neighborhood. In the future, the digitized …

 

google cached proxied

 

http://sfpl.org/?pg=0100002501

 

Potrero Meeting Room :: San Francisco Public Library

 

Steps for Reserving the Potrero Meeting Room. Check for room … Fax number: 415-557-4281. Potrero. 1616 20th Street. San Francisco, 94107. Capacity : 20.

 

google cached proxied

 

http://sfpl.org/?pg=0300001801

 

Full text of “The Potrero View (February 1992)” – Internet Archive

 

There had been no complaints until last month about the NAMBLA meetings, Acker …. that since the “library auditorium had become a public forum,” the library “may not …. Tom Ammiano SF School Board Protect Children Editor: Potrero Hill …

 

google cached proxied

 

https://archive.org/stream/potreroview%5B…%5Dse_4/potreroviewfebru01unse_4_djvu.txt

 

CALIFORNIA IN BRIEF : SAN FRANCISCO : Man-Boy Meetings …

 

Jan 17, 1992 … Meetings of the North American Man-Boy Love Assn. at a city library are being protested after news … About 60 people turned out at the Potrero Hill branch library to demand that NAMBLA be ousted. … It’s a public open space.

 

google cached proxied

 

http://articles.latimes.com/1992-01-17/news/mn-65_1_san-francisco

 

 

 

A SEX CLUB WAS SET-UP ON POTERO HILL CALLED “MISSION CONTROL” TO SEEK TO INDOCTRINATE “NEW MEAT” FOR PIZZAGATE, SF. SOME OF THE GOAT HILL PIZZA PEOPLE ATTEND MISSION CONTROL:

 

 

 

Techies flock to Mission Control, S.F. members-only sex club – SFGate

 

Mar 1, 2014 … Scott “Big Red” Farrell wasn’t sure he approved of the costumes on a recent Saturday night at a club in San Francisco’s Potrero Hill: hoodies, …

 

google cached proxied

 

http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/%5B…%5Dock-to-Mission-Control-S-F-5267323.php

 

 

 

 

 

IT GETS WORSE…

Nancy Pelosi Ensnared By #PizzaGate Sex And Payola Scandal

Nancy Pelosi Ensnared By #PizzaGate Sex And Payola Scandal

 

 

 

Guccifer 2.0: Is Nancy Pelosi’s Goat Hill Pizza Restaurant A Front Company Used To Funnel Money To The Democrats?

 

 

 

ShareTweet

 

 

The latest Guccifer 2.0 leaks reveal that Nanci Pelosi’s email account which is registered with Goat Hill Pizza, which has made numerous donations to the Democratic Party.

 

The Guccifer leak had her credentials to log into a campaign website and after doing a password reset on her account, sources say the email address said it was sent to a @goathill.com email.

 

 

On page two of the document ‘Certified List Of Elected Candidates For The November 2, 2004 General Election’ Nancy Pelosi’s email is listed as ‘PHILIP@GOATHILL.COM’.

 

 

The owner of Goat Hill Pizza is Philip DeAndrade.

 

 

He was a former staff member of Nanci Pelosi as recently as 2013 which can be found in the document ‘NP STAFF LIST UPDATED.xlsx’.

 

His email is ‘philip@goathill.com’.

 

Goat Hill Pizza on Potrero Hill Democratic Club’s website links to the donations:

 

 

 

Nanci Pelosi has used Foursquare to check into Goat Hill Pizza.

 

 

Goat Hill Pizza is owned by Goat Hill Inc.

 

People have pointed out Goat Hill Pizza’s Whois Guard is registered in Panama. This is common security and it is normal for websites to have their information hidden this way.

 

 

Goat Hill Pizza is now part of the Jobs Now! Wage Subsidy Program which makes the claim:

 

JobsNOW! offers Bay Area businesses a wage reimbursement to incentivize the hiring of eligible San Francisco job seekers and to help them grow their business.

 

Proof of their involvement (WARNING: Site automatically downloads a .doc file with employers listed)

 

Check out the JobsNOW! Wage Subsidy benefits:

 

As a Wage Subsidy employer, companies will be eligible to receive the following:

 

a) For positions that offer an eligible employee compensation at $13.50 an hour or greater, HSA will reimburse employer:

 

  • 100% of wages paid for 1st month

  • 75% of wages paid for the 2nd month

  • $1,000 a month for the remaining 3 months, assuming wages paid exceed $1,000 in the month.

  • Employees MUST work a minimum of 25 hours a week to be eligible for the reimbursement.

  • Note: HSA will reimburse for wages ONLY up to $35 an hour.  Wages paid in excess of $35 an hour are the sole responsibility of the employer.

 

b) For positions that offer employee compensation at less $13.50 an hour, HSA will reimburse employers an amount not to exceed $5,000 for each eligible employee hired:

 

  • The reimbursement will be paid in monthly installments not to exceed $1,000, for a period not to exceed 6-months.

  • Wages paid in excess of $1,000 in each calendar month are the sole responsibility of the Employer.

  • Employees MUST work a minimum of 25 hours a week to be eligible for the reimbursement.

 

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/5cptf0/nancy_pelosi_linked_to_pizzagate/

 

 

 

www.GoatHill.com – Nancy Pelosi Possibly Involved in Another …

 

9 hours ago … If you want to discuss the rules, go here – https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/ … Democrat Party leader Nancy Pelosi has links to another suspected …

 

google cached proxied

 

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1442209

 

SF’s Goat Hill Pizza is a front company for Nancy Pelosi | pizzagate

 

Nov 13, 2016 … SF’s Goat Hill Pizza is a front company for Nancy Pelosi (v/pizzagate) … http:// magafeed.com/guccifer-2-0-nancy-pelosis-goat-hill-pizza-may-be …

 

google cached proxied

 

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1438706

 

nancy pelosi may be using san francisco’s goat hill pizza to hide …

 

13 hours ago … Guccifer 2.0: Is Nancy Pelosi’s Goat Hill Pizza Restaurant A Front … FRANCISCO’S GOAT HILL PIZZA TO HIDE PIZZAGATE CRONY CASH …

 

google cached proxied

 

http://investigation1.net/nancy-pelosi%5B…%5Dll-pizza-to-hide-pizzagate-crony-cash/

 

 

 

DIRECTLY AROUND THE CORNER FROM GOAT HILL PIZZA IS THE MEETING SITE FOR THE SAN FRANCISCO PIZZAGATE GROUP: ONLY NANCY PELOSI HAD THE POLITICAL CLOUT TO COMMANDER A CITY PUBLIC LIBRARY FOR TWISTED SEX CLUB MEETINGS. OVER 30 SUSPECTED SEX RING MEMBERS LIVE ON SAN FRANCISCO’S POTRERO HILL:

 

 

 

 

 

 

San Francisco Public Library & NAMBLA

 

“The Portrero Hill branch of the San Francisco Public Library on a Saturday afternoon: … And upstairs … the regular monthly meeting of NAMBLA, the North American Man-Boy Love Association. This is … Potrero Parents Plan Protest at Library.

 

google cached proxied

 

http://www2.hawaii.edu/~donnab/lis610/SFPL_v_NAMBLA_sp12.ppt

 

“Pedophile Meetings Embroil SFPL in Controversy” by Flagg …

 

… San Francisco Public Library branch recently created headlines and aroused outrage … American Man-Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) were divulged in a Jan. … two days later some 50 area residents showed up at the Potrero Hill branch …

 

google cached proxied

 

https://www.questia.com/magazine/1G1-1%5B…%5De-meetings-embroil-sfpl-in-controversy

 

Parents Demand San Francisco Library Oust Pedophile Group

 

Jan 16, 1992 … SAN FRANCISCO (AP) _ For two years, members of the North … turned out at the Potrero Hill branch library, demanding the group’s ouster. … ”We can’t really attack the organization NAMBLA because the organization isn’t molesting children, it’s the individuals. … It’s a public open space,” Schneider said.

 

google cached proxied

 

http://www.apnewsarchive.com/1992/Pare%5B…%5Dup/id-d0fa3317cd9cea4693584d88ad814ba9

 

Potrero :: San Francisco Public Library

 

The collection was started in 1986 to record oral histories of Potrero Hill residents and gather old photographs of the neighborhood. In the future, the digitized …

 

google cached proxied

 

http://sfpl.org/?pg=0100002501

 

Potrero Meeting Room :: San Francisco Public Library

 

Steps for Reserving the Potrero Meeting Room. Check for room … Fax number: 415-557-4281. Potrero. 1616 20th Street. San Francisco, 94107. Capacity : 20.

 

google cached proxied

 

http://sfpl.org/?pg=0300001801

 

Full text of “The Potrero View (February 1992)” – Internet Archive

 

There had been no complaints until last month about the NAMBLA meetings, Acker …. that since the “library auditorium had become a public forum,” the library “may not …. Tom Ammiano SF School Board Protect Children Editor: Potrero Hill …

 

google cached proxied

 

https://archive.org/stream/potreroview%5B…%5Dse_4/potreroviewfebru01unse_4_djvu.txt

 

CALIFORNIA IN BRIEF : SAN FRANCISCO : Man-Boy Meetings …

 

Jan 17, 1992 … Meetings of the North American Man-Boy Love Assn. at a city library are being protested after news … About 60 people turned out at the Potrero Hill branch library to demand that NAMBLA be ousted. … It’s a public open space.

 

google cached proxied

 

http://articles.latimes.com/1992-01-17/news/mn-65_1_san-francisco

 

 

 

A SEX CLUB WAS SET-UP ON POTERO HILL CALLED “MISSION CONTROL” TO SEEK TO INDOCTRINATE “NEW MEAT” FOR PIZZAGATE, SF. SOME OF THE GOAT HILL PIZZA PEOPLE ATTEND MISSION CONTROL:

 

 

 

Techies flock to Mission Control, S.F. members-only sex club – SFGate

 

Mar 1, 2014 … Scott “Big Red” Farrell wasn’t sure he approved of the costumes on a recent Saturday night at a club in San Francisco’s Potrero Hill: hoodies, …

 

google cached proxied

 

http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/%5B…%5Dock-to-Mission-Control-S-F-5267323.php

 

 

 

 

 

IT GETS WORSE…

 

AFTER ELECTION GOP DOUBLES DOWN ON HILLARY FOR ONGOING ATTACKS

NANCY PELOSI MAY BE USING SAN FRANCISCO’S GOAT HILL PIZZA TO HIDE PIZZAGATE CRONY CASH

Guccifer 2.0: Is Nancy Pelosi’s Goat Hill Pizza Restaurant A Front Company Used To Funnel Money To The Democrats?

Flip



Image result for pizza

The latest Guccifer 2.0 leaks reveal that Nanci Pelosi’s email account which is registered with Goat Hill Pizza, which has made numerous donations to the Democratic Party.

The Guccifer leak had her credentials to log into a campaign website and after doing a password reset on her account, sources say the email address said it was sent to a @goathill.com email.

On page two of the document ‘Certified List Of Elected Candidates For The November 2, 2004 General Election’ Nancy Pelosi’s email is listed as ‘[email protected]’.

Screen Shot 2016-10-05 at 2.40.45 AM

Screen Shot 2016-10-05 at 2.53.55 AM

Full story: Guccifer 2.0: Is Nancy Pelosi’s Goat Hill Pizza Restaurant A Front Company Used To Funnel Money To The Democrats? – MagaFeed

Google Now Cuts Off All Income and News Coverage For Any Site That Publishes Anything Eric Schmidt Disagrees With

 

Google confirmed that it is soon going to ban fake news sites from using its ad network

Google confirmed that it is soon going to ban news sites from using its ad network (techworldzone.com)

 

submitted 4 hours ago by Bricolagefantasy1 to technology (+58|-0)

 

Jeffrey Epstein Lolita Express Flight Logs Published and it looks BAD!

http://gopandora.com/jeffrey-epstein-the-lolita-express-other-complete-flightlogs/

 

 

Insider Reveals DNC Secret Strategy in Clinton Recount…But It will Force Trump To Fully Prosecute Clinton

The Democrats’ real strategy in launching recounts

 

The recount in Wisconsin, and the coming ones in Michigan and Pennsylvania will not change the outcomes in any of the states.  No recount ever changes thousands of votes.  I do not think that is the purpose.

The recounts, if done by hand, which can be demanded, may take longer than the last day for completing the official counts in a state and directing Electoral College voters.  If all 3 states miss the deadline, Trump is at 260, Hillary at 232.  No one hits 270.  

Then this goes to Congress, where the House voting 1 vote per state elects Trump, and Senate selects Pence. This would be first time Pthis happened since 1824, but in that case, John Quincy Adams won in the House, though he had fewer electoral college votes than Andrew Jackson.  

If this goes to the US House and Senate, and the result is the same as result from the Electoral College without the recounts, why do it?  The answer is to make Trump seem even more illegitimate, that he did not win the popular vote  (he lost by over 2.1 million), he did not win the Electoral College (did not reach 270), and was elected by being inserted into the presidency by members of his own party in Congress.

National Reporters Announce Their Intentions For The 2017 Trump Administration

Scorching.

So says Kotaku‘s Stephen Totilo describing a Thanksgiving column titled, “No, Trump, We Can’t Just Get Along” by the New York Times‘ Charles Blow.

As the Newark Star-Ledger‘s Amy Kuperinsky notes, Blow “wouldn’t attend the meeting” between Trump an the Times earlier this week, and his column makes it clear why:

“Charles Blow to Donald Trump: ‘as long as there are ink and pixels, you will be the focus of my withering gaze,'” tweets the New York Times’ Amanda Hess.

Sports Illustrated‘s Richard Deitsch tweets, “Not sure I’ve ever seen an NYT columnist go this hard on a President or President Elect.”

“I wish for once Charles Blow would really tell us what he thinks,” jokes Haaretz‘s Chemi Shalev.

And finally, screenwriter Lucy Alibar has a fun Thanksgiving Day family activity, tweeting, “This is best read aloud, to a loved one. Thankful for Charles Blow & NYTimes.”

Good sign or terrible sign?

That’s what Lawfare‘s Susan Hennessey wonders upon reading Greg Miller‘s Washington Post piece reporting that “Trump has refused all but two intel briefings since win, while Pence is briefed daily.”

“Most inexperienced president in US history turning away intelligence briefers since election win,” is how Inter Press Service‘s Jasmin Ramsey puts it.

Politico‘s Edward-Isaac Dovere reminds us that Trump said “he knew more than the generals,” which makes his refusal to read security briefings all the more frustrating for Dovere.

Miller’s Washington Post colleague Philip Bump, master of understatement, said, “This seems like a questionable decision.”

ProPublica’s evil twin

That’s how ProPublica‘s Scott Klein describes a series of fake news sites run by a man in the suburbs named Jestin Coler who was tracked down by NPR‘s Laura Sydell for a profile. And you’ll never believe why he says he started it:

“WOW. NPR tracked down guy behind fake election news sites, he says he started it to discredit alt-right!” says a shocked Louis Anslow of Timeline.

Derek Newton of Entrepreneur Magazine highlighted this passage: “#Fakenews writer: we, ‘have tried to write fake news for liberals — but they just never take the bait.'”

But Nieman Lab‘s Joshua Benton warns against taking everything Coler says at face value: “Guy Who Makes Fake News For A Living May Not Be Reliable Narrator.”

In other piping hot Thanksgiving news…

“WOW – Jill Stein made it to TWO MILLION. $2,030,154,” says Rachel Sklar of The Li.st, referring to Stein’s efforts to raise $2.5 million by tomorrow to pay for a recount. “This is bananas. 2016 is bananas.”

According to the Huffington Post‘s Paul Blumenthal, “Trump Praised His Turkish Business Partner In A Call With President Erdogan.” MSNBC‘s Chris Hayes saw Blumenthal’s story “literally 5 seconds after I had a hypothetical about Trump’s business partners in Turkey creating a conflict,” he says.

“Drain the swamp?” asks the New York TimesNicholas Fandos. “$ in politics experts say Trump’s inaugural fundraising plans won’t much help,” he continues, linking to his latest story on Trump’s acceptance on inauguration day of money from corporations and big donors.

Dana Priest and Timothy A. Clary have a must-read piece in the New Yorker called, “The Disruptive Career of Michael Flynn, Trump’s National Security Adviser.” “Trump’s incoming national security adviser,” says the Atlantic‘s David Frum, “can’t manage, govern his temper, or distinguish truth from fantasy.”

“You’re no longer Reagan’s party.” That, according to The Hill‘s Jonathan Swan, is what Trump adviser Steve Moore has said to House Republicans. The Washington Post‘s Robert Costa finds this quote from Moore just as telling: “Steve Moore to House GOP: “Trump has converted the GOP into a populist working-class party.'”

On YouTube, “Donald Trump wishes a Happy Thanksgiving to Americans,” says BuzzFeed’s Claudia Koerner, “giving a special shout-out to ‘the inner cities.'”

ProPublica‘s Eric Umansky and Masha Gessen host a podcast titled, “How Journalists Need to Begin Imagining the Unimaginable.” As VICE SportsCaitlin Kelly puts it, quoting the pocast, “‘If you can’t imagine it happening, that’s your problem.’ Masha Gessen knows what she’s talking about so read up.”

New York Magazine‘s Rebecca Traister has a must-read piece called, “Blaming Clinton’s Base For Her Loss Is the Ultimate Insult.” “Sizzling takedown of the ‘shoulda-been-nicer-to-white-men’ election blame game,” tweets the New York Times’ Nina Bernstein.

And finally, this piece is a couple days old, but it’s essential Thanksgiving reading. In a Vox article called, “This Thanksgiving, a lot of Americans won’t want to – and can’t afford to – politely avoid politics,” Jenee Desmond Harris writes:

“I don’t have many good answers for [my cousin] about how to endure the Trump-inspired teasing that she, like many American kids, is experiencing. But I know one thing: She needs to talk about it, and the last thing I plan to do when I see her is avoid the topic of politics to preserve the mood of the holiday meal.”

 
 
 
 
 

Anna Dubenko, Editorial Director at Digg, will join the New York Times to help curate content for its NYT Now app.

And after 23 years covering the tech beat for The Wall Street Journal, Don Clark is departing next month, accepting a buyout offer.

 

Melania Trump Considers Cyber-Bullying Lawsuit Against Rosie O’Donnell For Abusing Her Child Online

 
 

AWFUL. Rosie O'Donnell Goes After 10 Year-Old Baron Trump - Calls Him Autistic

AWFUL. Rosie O’Donnell Goes After 10 Year-Old Baron Trump – Calls Him “Autistic” (thegatewaypundit.com)

submitted 1 day ago by Schmorganumb to news (+131|-6)

 

Melania Trump Considers Cyber-Bullying Lawsuit Against Rosie O’Donnell For Abusing Her Child Online

New Soros backed group “PropOrNot” will decide what is propaganda and what is truth for you.

 

 

New Soros backed group "PropOrNot" will decide what is propaganda and what is truth for you.

New Soros backed group “PropOrNot” will decide what is propaganda and what is truth for you. (theintercept.com)

submitted 20 hours ago by GIF-lLL-S0NG to whatever (+115|-0)

Washington Post Disgracefully Promotes a McCarthyite Blacklist

 

 

Washington Post Disgracefully Promotes a McCarthyite Blacklist From a New, Hidden, and Very Shady Group

Washington Post Disgracefully Promotes a McCarthyite Blacklist From a New, Hidden, and Very Shady Group (theintercept.com)

 

submitted 21 hours ago by Schmorganumb to news (+35|-1)

Glenn Greenwald Just Beat The Snot Out Of Fake News Rag ‘The Washington Post’

profile
 
 

Glenn Greenwald Just Beat The Snot Out Of Fake News Rag ‘The Washington Post’

#GlennGreenwald #Intercept #FakeNews #WashingtonPost #Propaganda
article image

In a single article, Greenwald highlighted all the sickest elements of WaPo, corporate media, and the neoliberal agenda, and ripped it all to shreds.

 
Debate 0
Login and Click Agree/Disagree first to Debate.
 
 

In a sixteen-hour window overlapping March 6th and 7th, the Washington Post published a truly gobsmacking sixteen smear pieces on Bernie Sanders during what was arguably the single most heated period of the Democratic primaries. Those sixteen hours happened to include the crucial debate between Sanders and Hillary Clinton in Michigan, a state that Sanders went on to win in a shocking upset. 

In response to the understandable outrage expressed by Sanders supporters and anyone who cares about journalistic integrity, WaPo trotted out one of their shill reporters to defend their shill rag, who seriously tried to argue that hit pieces trying to slyly cast Sanders as a racist and a crime-coddler were “rooted in math” and therefore impartial, because Sanders was having more success in states with a greater white majority and wanted to decrease America’s embarrassingly huge prison population. 

Sixteen smear pieces in sixteen hours. And yet this ridiculous parody of a news media outlet has the gall to run story after story decrying “fake news”.

In their latest frantic attempt to claw power back to the neoliberal establishment, WaPo has published an extremely popular article titled “Russian propaganda effort helped spread ‘fake news’ during election, experts say,” reporting that unnamed, anonymous “experts” working for a brand new organization calling itself PropOrNot have used an unnamed, unknown methodology to produce a list of alternative media organizations it claims are “routine peddlers of Russian propaganda” and passing it off as news. This now-viral blacklist (literally titled “The List” on ProOrNot’s website) includes such esteemed media outlets as The Drudge Report and Naked Capitalism, as well as WikiLeaks, Zero HedgeTruthout, Black Agenda Report, Consortium News, Truthdig, Antiwar.com, The Anti-Media, and The Ron Paul Institute.

“Basically,” writes Glenn Greenwald in a surgical evisceration of this insipid neoliberal shill piece that you absolutely must read, “everyone who isn’t comfortably within the centrist Hillary-Clinton/Jeb-Bush spectrum is guilty.”

Greenwald points out some of WaPo’s violations of journalistic integrity that are even more egregious than the sixteen smear pieces in sixteen hours, like the way they pushed deceitful pro-war propaganda in the leadup to the Iraq invasion, an unforgivable act of needless military aggression that got upwards of a million people killed to prop up the U.S. petrodollar economy, and when they ran an actual, serious article about some guy’s conspiracy theory that Hillary Clinton’s collapse on 9/11 Day was due to her having been poisoned by Putin operatives. 

Greenwald goes on to argue just how absurd PropOrNot is as an establishment, how childish whoever runs its Twitter account is, how many outlets passed on this story before WaPo agreed to run it, what that says about their journalistic integrity, and how disturbing it is that this deceitful, pernicious story “spread like wildfire” upon its release.

“Even more disturbing than the Post’s shoddy journalism in this instance,” Greenwald adds, “is the broader trend in which any wild conspiracy theory or McCarthyite attack is now permitted in U.S. discourse as long as it involves Russia and Putin – just as was true in the 1950s when stories of how the Russians were poisoning the U.S. water supply or infiltrating American institutions were commonplace. Any anti-Russia story was – and is – instantly vested with credibility, while anyone questioning its veracity or evidentiary basis is subject to attacks on their loyalties or, at best, vilified as “useful idiots.””

Greenwald’s article highlights brilliantly the sickest aspects of the neoliberal establishment, especially its nonstop bloodthirsty drive toward a military confrontation with Russia. It might be shocking to see media outlets that allege themselves to belong to the political left pushing for a war with a nuclear superpower, and to see people who identify as liberals and progressives actively subscribing to that push themselves, but if you’ve got your ear to the ground it isn’t really surprising. Just as when Saddam broke the OPEC convention of selling oil exclusively in U.S. dollars, threatening the unseen foundation of neoliberal economics, Russia has been working with China to move away from the U.S. dollar as a reserve currency and buying up gold like it’s going out of style. Syria, where Russia is forming an extremely useful alliance, is also one of the few nations left government-owned central bank, which the neoliberal International Monetary Fund has openly stated it wants to change. The bankers who have risen to such immense power under the neoliberal system aren’t having any of this, and they’re trying to use their plutocratic leverage and unprecedented control of the media to stop it. It remains to be seen if Trump will play ball with this agenda or will remain as opposed to it as he claims to be.

Until then, stay watchful dear reader. WikiLeaks revealed beyond a doubt that our government is lying to us and the media is helping them, and this latest stunt by WaPo shows there are no depths these people won’t stoop to.

 

 

I’ve gone rogue. If you enjoyed reading this as much as I enjoyed writing it, give a lass a hand by sharing it, liking me up bigly on Facebook, or even maybe chucking a few shekels my way on Patreon

Image

The Cicada Is A Feature and Not A Bug

#PIzzaGate Gets Even Bigger: Even Main Stream News Is Starting To Cover It

 

 

Pizzagate Hits Voat Shortly After Being Banned On Reddit, Comet Ping Pong Nightmare Continues

Pizzagate Hits Voat Shortly After Being Banned On Reddit, Comet Ping Pong Nightmare Continues (archive.is)

submitted 13 hours ago by Codewow to news (+42|-4)

 
 

Democrat Joe Biden, long rumored to be a pedophile, is caught fondling young girls' breasts

Democrat Joe Biden, long rumored to be a pedophile, is caught fondling young girls’ breasts (youtube.com)

submitted 2.1 hours ago by gramman74 to whatever (+53|-1)

BOOZE FOUND TO BE TOP CAUSE OF CANCER AND 20 OTHER LETHAL DISEASES

http://www.vox.com/2015/6/15/8774233/alcohol-dangerous

 

Trump Bypasses Media With Direct YouTube/Twitter Distribution As Feud With Mainstream Outlets Rages

Trump Bypasses Media With Direct YouTube/Twitter Distribution As Feud With Mainstream Outlets Rages

Tyler Durden's picture

For the past year and a half the Trump team has played the mainstream media like a fiddle.  During the republican primary, he was granted millions of dollars of free air time as the unwitting mainstream outlets thought they were boosting one of Hillary’s chosen “pied piper” candidates that could be easily defeated in the general election.  Then, after helping to catapult him to the republican nomination the media predictably turned on him in a blatant effort to elect their chosen candidate.  Unfortunately for the mainstream media, none of their plans to destroy Trump came close to working and, in fact, he used their corrupt, biased coverage to rally his supporters which is likely a big reason for his ultimate victory.

Perhaps no one has summarized Trump’s relationship with the media and establishment institutions better than Michael Moore who famously predicted two weeks before election day that Trump’s election would be the “biggest fuck you ever recorded in human history”:

 
 

“They [working class voters] see that the elites who ruined their lives hate Trump.  Corporate American hates Trump.  Wall Street hates Trump.  The career politicians hate Trump.  The media hates Trump, after they loved him and created him and now hate him.  Thank you, media.  The enemy of my enemy is who I’m voting for on November 8th.”

But now that the campaigning is finally over, the true panic is setting in for the mainstream media as Trump is threatening to cut off the one thing they have left:  access.

While Trump’s decision to bypass the media in recent days (starting with the message below posted on YouTube which has received millions of views) by speaking directly with the American electorate through direct distribution outlets like YouTube and Twitter may not seem like a big deal, it has the potential to be quite revolutionary.  After running a campaign that proved that blatant, and frankly insulting, pandering to various minority groups and endless cash hoards weren’t necessarily direct determinants of election success, Trump seems intent upon proving that the mainstream media can be completely bypassed in the modern world…and it is glorious to watch.

 

Of course, we suspect this is part of the reason for the mainstream media’s recent crusade against “fake news” outlets, of which we’re apparently one.  To the extent they can discredit competitive news sources then they get to maintain their monopoly on ideas and information, and the blatant manipulation of those ideas into their own customized narratives.

As The Hill points out, Trump’s distaste for the media is starting to sow fear and panic in the mainstreamers.  For evidence of that fact, one has to look no further than the outrage expressed when Trump decided to ditch the press to have a steak dinner with his family.  Where was that same outrage when Hillary ditched the press on 9/11 because of her pneumonia?

 
 

White House reporters are worried about access to Trump, who didn’t allow reporters on his campaign plane and ditched media staking out Trump Tower last week to have dinner with family at New York’s 21 Club.

 

The president-elect’s frequent threats to the press have added to a sense that the rules for covering this White House might be different.

 

“Every incoming president has basic, generally agreed upon rules of the road,” said Joe Lockhart, who served as White House press secretary for President Bill Clinton.

 

“The Trump team has decided they’ll blow up and the road and build a new one. Where it goes from here will be a test of how far the new president and his team want to push things, and the strength and will of the press to push back.”

As The Hill further notes, Trump has little incentive to go through traditional media outlets.  Not only have they proven time and again to be an extension of the democratic party but with his social media following, Trump’s direct distribution of his message gets just as much coverage as a press conference would.

 
 

But Trump has little incentive to go through traditional media channels, some experts say.

 

Facebook and Twitter combine to give him one of the most powerful social media presences in the world.

 

He has former Breitbart executive Stephen Bannon at his side in the White House, giving him a powerful ally in the massively influential world of right-wing news.

 

And when Trump releases a straight-to-camera video to announce his 100-day agenda — as he did this week, in lieu of a press conference — it elicits the same volume of coverage as a press conference would.

 

Trump was lavished with billions of dollars worth of free airtime and exposure during the campaign, irrespective of how he chose to engage.

 

Press advocates are worried that the president-elect appears to be holding all the cards.

As the head of the advocacy group Free Press points out “over the last 20 to 30 years, each White House has thrown up more obstacles and become more obsessed with controlling their own message, but this is a new apex, and it’s really dangerous.”  While we tend to agree that the disintermediation of the corrupt media may be dangerous for their employees…we suspect the rest of us will be just fine.

FACEBOOK IS DESTROYING THE WORLD: HOW FACEBOOK BOSSES RIG THE WEB FOR GREED AND POLITICAL POWER

 

 

FACEBOOK IS DESTROYING THE WORLD: HOW FACEBOOK BOSSES RIG THE WEB FOR GREED AND POLITICAL POWER

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quincy Larson

 

Teacher at https://FreeCodeCamp.com

 

I can’t just stand by and watch Mark Zuckerberg destroy the internet.

 

 

With great power comes great responsibility” — Uncle Ben

 

Mark Zuckerberg — Facebook’s CEO — is probably the most powerful person alive today. He may even be the most powerful person ever.

 

Traditionally, the president of the United States has been considered the most powerful person on Earth. After all, President Obama controls the most powerful military on the planet, and has considerable influence over the $18 trillion US economy.

 

 

But President Obama is beholden to systems that keep his power in check: congress and the supreme court, term limits (he will be forced to retire in January), and the will of the American electorate.

 

Mark Zuckerberg has none of these limitations. His power flows from Facebook, the seventh largest corporation on the planet by market capitalization, of which he owns 18% of the stock and controls 60% of the voting rights.

 

At 32 years of age, he could remain the CEO of Facebook for another 50 years.

 

But financials are just a small part of what makes Facebook so powerful. Here are some ways it dominates human attention:

 

  1. More than one billion people use Facebook each day. 1/4 of all time spent on the internet is spent using Facebook.

  2. For many people, Facebook is the internet. It’s the first place most people go to announce weddings, births, deaths, and other major life events.

  3. Facebook is increasingly the place where people consume other forms of media.

 

Through its Free Basics program, Facebook has literally become the internet for the world’s poor (who have to pay money to access websites that are outside of Facebook).

 

Facebook has also used its monopoly on human attention to control what news is shown to whom, affecting public opinion from the shadows.

 

And Facebook knows far more about humanity — and individual humans — than any other company or government on Earth. 500 terabytes of our personal data flow into Facebook every day.

 

So far, Zuckerberg has mainly used Facebook’s power to further grow Facebook. He’s acquired Facebook’s most serious competitors: Instagram and WhatsApp. He’s now competing with YouTube for video and Twitter for real time communication.

 

He’s even creating AIs and launching satellites (though his first one ended up exploding on the launch pad).

 

 

But as Facebook races toward becoming the largest corporation ever, Zuckerberg’s plans for it may change.

 

Even though he has pledged to give away 99% of his Facebook stock during the course of his life, he will retain control of its board. And his power comes not from his billions of dollars, but from his access to our attention and our data.

 

His role in shaping humanity is so substantial that there’s even a team of university professors who log and analyze literally everything Zuckerberg says, in the hope of understanding his motivations and future plans.

 

For the rest of his life, Zuckerberg will be able to bring Facebook’s incredible power to bear in achieving whatever ends he desires.

 

But is he responsible?

 

Here’s Zuckerberg’s recent post about what he’s doing to stop fake news on Facebook, in which he says, “The bottom line is: we take misinformation seriously.”

 

 

And right next to Zuckerberg’s post, there are two ads for fake news stories.

 

Fake news may have played a huge role in the outcome of the US presidential election, and many other recent elections.

 

Even fake headlines — often used to trick people into clicking through ads to unrelated products — can do damage. Headlines are the only part of a news story that most people bother to read. On their own, headlines can substantially sway public opinion.

 

And fake news isn’t the only major Facebook controversy this week.

 

Yesterday, people inside Facebook leaked to the New York Times that Facebook is actively working on a sophisticated censorship tool.

 

Zuckerberg’s apparent goal is to re-enter the Chinese market, where Facebook has been blocked since 2009.

 

Is it a responsible use of power for Zuckerberg to use his company’s vast wealth and army of software engineers to aid in the repression of the world’s most populous country? All so he can get more market share?

 

Facebook everywhere

 

Facebook is already on our phones and computers, pestering us with notifications.

 

For example, Facebook Messenger pops up on top of whatever you’re doing every single time someone sends you a message.

 

 

If you try to shut off notifications in Facebook Messenger, here are the options it gives you:

 

 

That’s right — the only way to shut off these annoying notifications for more than 24 hours at a time is to go all the way down to the operating system level.

 

And Zuckerberg won’t stop at merely pervading our existence. He wants for Facebook to be our existence.

 

Here’s a demo of Facebook Social VR, built on top of Oculus, a company he acquired in 2014:

 

It’s striking how mundane all this looks. You can go anywhere and do anything, but instead you’re going to fast-travel to your living room and take a selfie with your dog? But I digress.

 

Zuckerberg has been clear that he intends to create — then monetize — artificial scarcity. He envisions a future where you can pay extra money to get a better seat in a virtual reality-broadcast sporting event.

 

The supply of front row seats in VR should technically be unlimited. Bleachers in a VR experience are not bound by the normal rules of space and time. But you’ll have to pay extra to keep those other avatars’ heads from blocking your view of the game.

 

Add to this the fact that, in VR, ads can be literally everywhere. With eye tracking, you won’t be able to avert your gaze from them.

 

And with Facebook’s ever-growing corpus of data about you — and its capitalist mandate to maximize value for its shareholders — these ads will continue to get creepier and creepier.

 

Facebook is a threat to the open web

 

Something like Facebook could never have emerged within Facebook. It needed an open web within which to gestate.

 

Despite this, Facebook is taking conscious efforts — like Free Basics — to destroy the open web. It’s destroying the very environment that made its own existence possible.

 

Google co-founder Sergey Brin has condemned Facebook, and acknowledged that Google itself couldn’t succeed in the “walled garden” web that Facebook is creating:

 

You have to play by their rules, which are really restrictive. The kind of environment that we developed Google in, the reason that we were able to develop a search engine, is the web was so open. Once you get too many rules, that will stifle innovation.”

 

By locking down the web, Facebook is not only sucking up more and more of humanity’s waking hours — it’s poisoning the well.

 

Organizations that would otherwise eventually emerge to challenge Facebook’s dominance will never even be able to find the fertile soil they need to take root in the first place.

 

What can you do about it?

 

Many people’s instinctive reaction is to delete their Facebook account and simply ignore it.

 

Unfortunately, deleting your Facebook account won’t help. That will just lead to even fewer reasonable people on Facebook.

 

Like it or not, many of the people who need to hear your thoughtful opinions the most are right there, hanging out on Facebook.

 

They are your extended family. Your high school classmates. And they’re being bathed in pathos and misinformation all day long.

 

They need to see your reasonable opinions and your thoughtful responses to their own, often unreasonable ones.

 

I for one have no plans of deleting my Facebook account.

 

I’m not going to retreat into some literati echo chamber where I might otherwise prefer to spend my time.

 

I’m going to stick it out, and continue to fight misinformation with wit and reason.

 

And I hope you will, too.

 

Making the experience more bearable

 

There are some ways you can make Facebook a saner place for yourself.

 

  1. The trending section is filled with ads and misinformation. You can block it — along with ads and many other things you don’t like about Facebook — by installing the Facebook Purity Chrome extension.

  2. Decline Facebook’s frequent requests for your data. Don’t give them your phone number or access to your Gmail contacts. And don’t use Facebook authentication to sign into websites or apps.

  3. Think twice about sharing any personal information. It’s OK to post pictures of you with your kids, but I definitely wouldn’t post angry rants or live-stream from a happy hour. Handing Facebook these moments of weakness can only hurt you down the road.

 

Finally, educate yourself on how the web works, and why an open web is so critical. Read this excellent book on Net Neutrality and the ongoing battle for the internet:

 

 

Thanks for reading this. If you liked this, click the 💚 below so other people will see this here on Medium.

Eric Schmidt Orders “The Truth” to be gassed and burned in Google’s web ovens.

Google’s Jared Cohen and Larry Page put on their SS uniforms and comply because “nothing matters but the final solution..”

The Upcoming War On The Alternative Media By The Deep State Mainstream Media

By Rahul Manchanda, Esq.

This declaration of war was typified by Google and FaceBook

by Rahul Manchanda, Esq.

The Mainstream Media (“MSM”), fully owned and co-opted by the Deep State Plutocrat/ Oligarch Elite, are extremely unhappy that Donald Trump won the 2016 Election.

They did not bank on this, and were completely and totally confident that their trillions of dollars of money issued by the Federal Reserve and international central banks, control of the National Security State as represented by the Military Industrial Complex, and bought and paid for representatives in the United States Legislature (Congress and Senate), Executive Branch, and Judiciary would have ensured their victory.

So what turned this election around, to upset the proverbial apple cart and deliver the Presidency to Donald J. Trump?

Even the MSM has openly and formally admitted that it was the tireless and “round the clock” work of the alternative media, but instead of giving the millions of independent investigators, whistleblowers, independent journalists, and other patriotic Americans who respect and fought for the First Amendment of the United States Constitution the respect that they deserve, instead they declared “war” on all of them this past week, by announcing that they would block, filter, drown out, and crush them all, as being purveyors of “Fake News.”

This declaration of war was typified by Google and FaceBook, who then tried to claim that they were not “media outlets,” but rather “search engines” or “social media sites” with a “responsibility” to ensure that “fake news” does not infect the political process.

Even President Obama was apparently coerced into joining this “bullshit bandwagon,” when he went around Europe this past week during his latest speech tour, telling the media that he too supported outlawing “fake news” while wiping away fake crocodile tears, because he “cares so much” about the American People.

When, and how, these gargantuan media behemoths took it upon themselves, and arrogated unto themselves this right, is beyond anyone’s comprehension or understanding, but it most certainly belies the supreme and total arrogance, bullying, intimidation, and coercion of the Deep State Plutocrat/Oligarch Elite, and must be resisted with the peaceful and non-violent full force, might, temerity, and aggression of all of America’s 300,000,000 citizenry, tooth and nail.

For this promise, announced by the Deep State MSM, is an outright threat to the First Amendment, by a purely private and sprawling commercial entity, and is no less dangerous than the threat of removing any other of America’s other hard-won and hard-fought for Amendments.

The reason that it is the “First” Amendment, is because the Founding Fathers probably believed that it was the most important of all of them.

Since the MSM is not considered a governmental body, it might be able to crush and destroy this First Amendment with impunity, as the First Amendment only truly applies to public legislation issued by a government sponsored entity – indeed the text of the edict states that

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

But what happens when the MSM has openly, flagrantly, and clearly infiltrated, dominated and has become synonymous with, the United States Government?

Ron Paul@RonPaul2h2 hours ago

REVEALED: The Real Fake News List ronpaullibertyreport.com/archives/revea…

 

 

When one can no longer recognize the difference, because of the MSM’s incestuous and intermingled relationship with the US Government?

 

The American People must resist this open declaration of war on the alternative media, tooth and nail, lock stock and barrel, and President-Elect Donald Trump must immediately set about dismantling, breaking up, and destroying this unholy alliance by and between private media and public government, because even though he got elected in huge part by the alternative media, the Deep State Plutocrat/Oligarch Mainstream Media is going to do everything within its power to ensure that none of his mandate and promises to the American people will ever be fulfilled, or realized.

 

See: Reporters who met in secret and coordinated with Hillary’s campaign.

 

Also see related articles:

 

The Illusion of Choice: Ninety Percent of American Media Controlled by Six Corporations

 

These 6 Corporations Control 90% Of The Media In America

 

Can The American People Defeat The Oligarchy That Rules Them? — Paul Craig Roberts

 

Google’s Pro-Clinton Search Bias Reflects US Tech Firms’ Ties to ‘Deep State’ 

Google now listing Wikileaks as a ‘dangerous’ site 

Julian Assange Fingers Mossadist Jew Jared Cohen in Google Duplicity 

Assange: Google as a Creature of the State Department 

Subverting Free Expression: Assange Accuses Google of Being a Tool Used by the US to Silence Dissent 

Israel to Coordinate with Google, YouTube, to Censor Palestinian Videos of Conflict 

Google Investigated by FTC Over Search Abuse 

White House Official Cozied Up to Google Before Antitrust Lawsuit Was Shelved

 

Israeli Official Meets with Google and YouTube to Censor Palestinian Videos 

Google and Israel discuss educational collaboration 

Clinton Emails Show Zeal for Syrian War by Google, Israel, Team Hillary 

Google Manipulates Search Results, According to Study from Yelp and Legal Star Tim Wu 

Senator presses FTC to reopen Google antitrust case as EU Commissioner comes to town 

Google: The Center of Conspiracy “More Vast than the Rothschilds and Bilderbergs” 

Apple and Google Just Attended a Confidential Spy Summit in a Remote English Mansion 

Pentagon and Google join forces to advance US military hegemonic capacity 

How the CIA made Google 

Google’s deep CIA and NSA connections 

Assange: Google Is Not What It Seems 

Google entrenched in Zionist ethics, politics 

Google involved with Clinton campaign, controls information flow – Assange 

Revolving door’: Google & EU govts’ cross-hiring revealed in new report 

Google’s ‘Regime Change’ Agent, Jared Cohen 

WikiLeaks: Google & Al-Jazeera Encouraged Civil War in Syria

Google planned to help Syrian rebels bring down Assad regime, leaked Hillary Clinton emails claim 

Clinton Emails Reveal Google’s Role in Attempting to Oust Syria’s Assad 

Google this! Hillary Clinton and the Syrian regime-change conspiracy 

StratforLeaks: Google Ideas Director Involved in ‘Regime Change’

 

If this is true, it is a disgrace’: Donald Trump responds to viral video claiming Google’s search is biased

Wikileaks Global Intelligence Files, Israel Day 18: Google’s Covert Role in Arab Uprisings

Wikileaks’ Assange: Google Directly Allied with Clinton Campaign

 

 

Executive Chairman of Google Eric Schmidt (front left) and Director of Google Ideas Jared Cohen (back left).

 

 

 

Facebook Is Destroying The World: How Facebook Bosses Are Rigging The Web For Greed and Political Control

 

 

Quincy Larson

 

Teacher at https://FreeCodeCamp.com

 

I can’t just stand by and watch Mark Zuckerberg destroy the internet.

 

 

With great power comes great responsibility” — Uncle Ben

 

Mark Zuckerberg — Facebook’s CEO — is probably the most powerful person alive today. He may even be the most powerful person ever.

 

Traditionally, the president of the United States has been considered the most powerful person on Earth. After all, President Obama controls the most powerful military on the planet, and has considerable influence over the $18 trillion US economy.

 

 

But President Obama is beholden to systems that keep his power in check: congress and the supreme court, term limits (he will be forced to retire in January), and the will of the American electorate.

 

Mark Zuckerberg has none of these limitations. His power flows from Facebook, the seventh largest corporation on the planet by market capitalization, of which he owns 18% of the stock and controls 60% of the voting rights.

 

At 32 years of age, he could remain the CEO of Facebook for another 50 years.

 

But financials are just a small part of what makes Facebook so powerful. Here are some ways it dominates human attention:

 

  1. More than one billion people use Facebook each day. 1/4 of all time spent on the internet is spent using Facebook.

  2. For many people, Facebook is the internet. It’s the first place most people go to announce weddings, births, deaths, and other major life events.

  3. Facebook is increasingly the place where people consume other forms of media.

 

Through its Free Basics program, Facebook has literally become the internet for the world’s poor (who have to pay money to access websites that are outside of Facebook).

 

Facebook has also used its monopoly on human attention to control what news is shown to whom, affecting public opinion from the shadows.

 

And Facebook knows far more about humanity — and individual humans — than any other company or government on Earth. 500 terabytes of our personal data flow into Facebook every day.

 

So far, Zuckerberg has mainly used Facebook’s power to further grow Facebook. He’s acquired Facebook’s most serious competitors: Instagram and WhatsApp. He’s now competing with YouTube for video and Twitter for real time communication.

 

He’s even creating AIs and launching satellites (though his first one ended up exploding on the launch pad).

 

 

But as Facebook races toward becoming the largest corporation ever, Zuckerberg’s plans for it may change.

 

Even though he has pledged to give away 99% of his Facebook stock during the course of his life, he will retain control of its board. And his power comes not from his billions of dollars, but from his access to our attention and our data.

 

His role in shaping humanity is so substantial that there’s even a team of university professors who log and analyze literally everything Zuckerberg says, in the hope of understanding his motivations and future plans.

 

For the rest of his life, Zuckerberg will be able to bring Facebook’s incredible power to bear in achieving whatever ends he desires.

 

But is he responsible?

 

Here’s Zuckerberg’s recent post about what he’s doing to stop fake news on Facebook, in which he says, “The bottom line is: we take misinformation seriously.”

 

 

And right next to Zuckerberg’s post, there are two ads for fake news stories.

 

Fake news may have played a huge role in the outcome of the US presidential election, and many other recent elections.

 

Even fake headlines — often used to trick people into clicking through ads to unrelated products — can do damage. Headlines are the only part of a news story that most people bother to read. On their own, headlines can substantially sway public opinion.

 

And fake news isn’t the only major Facebook controversy this week.

 

Yesterday, people inside Facebook leaked to the New York Times that Facebook is actively working on a sophisticated censorship tool.

 

Zuckerberg’s apparent goal is to re-enter the Chinese market, where Facebook has been blocked since 2009.

 

Is it a responsible use of power for Zuckerberg to use his company’s vast wealth and army of software engineers to aid in the repression of the world’s most populous country? All so he can get more market share?

 

Facebook everywhere

 

Facebook is already on our phones and computers, pestering us with notifications.

 

For example, Facebook Messenger pops up on top of whatever you’re doing every single time someone sends you a message.

 

 

If you try to shut off notifications in Facebook Messenger, here are the options it gives you:

 

 

That’s right — the only way to shut off these annoying notifications for more than 24 hours at a time is to go all the way down to the operating system level.

 

And Zuckerberg won’t stop at merely pervading our existence. He wants for Facebook to be our existence.

 

Here’s a demo of Facebook Social VR, built on top of Oculus, a company he acquired in 2014:

 

It’s striking how mundane all this looks. You can go anywhere and do anything, but instead you’re going to fast-travel to your living room and take a selfie with your dog? But I digress.

 

Zuckerberg has been clear that he intends to create — then monetize — artificial scarcity. He envisions a future where you can pay extra money to get a better seat in a virtual reality-broadcast sporting event.

 

The supply of front row seats in VR should technically be unlimited. Bleachers in a VR experience are not bound by the normal rules of space and time. But you’ll have to pay extra to keep those other avatars’ heads from blocking your view of the game.

 

Add to this the fact that, in VR, ads can be literally everywhere. With eye tracking, you won’t be able to avert your gaze from them.

 

And with Facebook’s ever-growing corpus of data about you — and its capitalist mandate to maximize value for its shareholders — these ads will continue to get creepier and creepier.

 

Facebook is a threat to the open web

 

Something like Facebook could never have emerged within Facebook. It needed an open web within which to gestate.

 

Despite this, Facebook is taking conscious efforts — like Free Basics — to destroy the open web. It’s destroying the very environment that made its own existence possible.

 

Google co-founder Sergey Brin has condemned Facebook, and acknowledged that Google itself couldn’t succeed in the “walled garden” web that Facebook is creating:

 

You have to play by their rules, which are really restrictive. The kind of environment that we developed Google in, the reason that we were able to develop a search engine, is the web was so open. Once you get too many rules, that will stifle innovation.”

 

By locking down the web, Facebook is not only sucking up more and more of humanity’s waking hours — it’s poisoning the well.

 

Organizations that would otherwise eventually emerge to challenge Facebook’s dominance will never even be able to find the fertile soil they need to take root in the first place.

 

What can you do about it?

 

Many people’s instinctive reaction is to delete their Facebook account and simply ignore it.

 

Unfortunately, deleting your Facebook account won’t help. That will just lead to even fewer reasonable people on Facebook.

 

Like it or not, many of the people who need to hear your thoughtful opinions the most are right there, hanging out on Facebook.

 

They are your extended family. Your high school classmates. And they’re being bathed in pathos and misinformation all day long.

 

They need to see your reasonable opinions and your thoughtful responses to their own, often unreasonable ones.

 

I for one have no plans of deleting my Facebook account.

 

I’m not going to retreat into some literati echo chamber where I might otherwise prefer to spend my time.

 

I’m going to stick it out, and continue to fight misinformation with wit and reason.

 

And I hope you will, too.

 

Making the experience more bearable

 

There are some ways you can make Facebook a saner place for yourself.

 

  1. The trending section is filled with ads and misinformation. You can block it — along with ads and many other things you don’t like about Facebook — by installing the Facebook Purity Chrome extension.

  2. Decline Facebook’s frequent requests for your data. Don’t give them your phone number or access to your Gmail contacts. And don’t use Facebook authentication to sign into websites or apps.

  3. Think twice about sharing any personal information. It’s OK to post pictures of you with your kids, but I definitely wouldn’t post angry rants or live-stream from a happy hour. Handing Facebook these moments of weakness can only hurt you down the road.

 

Finally, educate yourself on how the web works, and why an open web is so critical. Read this excellent book on Net Neutrality and the ongoing battle for the internet:

 

 

Thanks for reading this. If you liked this, click the 💚 below so other people will see this here on Medium.

Eric Schmidt Orders “The Truth” to be gassed and burned in Google’s web ovens.

Google’s Jared Cohen and Larry Page put on their SS uniforms and comply because “nothing matters but the final solution..”

The Upcoming War On The Alternative Media By The Deep State Mainstream Media

By Rahul Manchanda, Esq.

This declaration of war was typified by Google and FaceBook

by Rahul Manchanda, Esq.

The Mainstream Media (“MSM”), fully owned and co-opted by the Deep State Plutocrat/ Oligarch Elite, are extremely unhappy that Donald Trump won the 2016 Election.

They did not bank on this, and were completely and totally confident that their trillions of dollars of money issued by the Federal Reserve and international central banks, control of the National Security State as represented by the Military Industrial Complex, and bought and paid for representatives in the United States Legislature (Congress and Senate), Executive Branch, and Judiciary would have ensured their victory.

So what turned this election around, to upset the proverbial apple cart and deliver the Presidency to Donald J. Trump?

Even the MSM has openly and formally admitted that it was the tireless and “round the clock” work of the alternative media, but instead of giving the millions of independent investigators, whistleblowers, independent journalists, and other patriotic Americans who respect and fought for the First Amendment of the United States Constitution the respect that they deserve, instead they declared “war” on all of them this past week, by announcing that they would block, filter, drown out, and crush them all, as being purveyors of “Fake News.”

This declaration of war was typified by Google and FaceBook, who then tried to claim that they were not “media outlets,” but rather “search engines” or “social media sites” with a “responsibility” to ensure that “fake news” does not infect the political process.

Even President Obama was apparently coerced into joining this “bullshit bandwagon,” when he went around Europe this past week during his latest speech tour, telling the media that he too supported outlawing “fake news” while wiping away fake crocodile tears, because he “cares so much” about the American People.

When, and how, these gargantuan media behemoths took it upon themselves, and arrogated unto themselves this right, is beyond anyone’s comprehension or understanding, but it most certainly belies the supreme and total arrogance, bullying, intimidation, and coercion of the Deep State Plutocrat/Oligarch Elite, and must be resisted with the peaceful and non-violent full force, might, temerity, and aggression of all of America’s 300,000,000 citizenry, tooth and nail.

For this promise, announced by the Deep State MSM, is an outright threat to the First Amendment, by a purely private and sprawling commercial entity, and is no less dangerous than the threat of removing any other of America’s other hard-won and hard-fought for Amendments.

The reason that it is the “First” Amendment, is because the Founding Fathers probably believed that it was the most important of all of them.

Since the MSM is not considered a governmental body, it might be able to crush and destroy this First Amendment with impunity, as the First Amendment only truly applies to public legislation issued by a government sponsored entity – indeed the text of the edict states that

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

But what happens when the MSM has openly, flagrantly, and clearly infiltrated, dominated and has become synonymous with, the United States Government?

Ron Paul@RonPaul2h2 hours ago

REVEALED: The Real Fake News List ronpaullibertyreport.com/archives/revea…

 

 

When one can no longer recognize the difference, because of the MSM’s incestuous and intermingled relationship with the US Government?

 

The American People must resist this open declaration of war on the alternative media, tooth and nail, lock stock and barrel, and President-Elect Donald Trump must immediately set about dismantling, breaking up, and destroying this unholy alliance by and between private media and public government, because even though he got elected in huge part by the alternative media, the Deep State Plutocrat/Oligarch Mainstream Media is going to do everything within its power to ensure that none of his mandate and promises to the American people will ever be fulfilled, or realized.

 

See: Reporters who met in secret and coordinated with Hillary’s campaign.

 

Also see related articles:

 

The Illusion of Choice: Ninety Percent of American Media Controlled by Six Corporations

 

These 6 Corporations Control 90% Of The Media In America

 

Can The American People Defeat The Oligarchy That Rules Them? — Paul Craig Roberts

 

Google’s Pro-Clinton Search Bias Reflects US Tech Firms’ Ties to ‘Deep State’ 

Google now listing Wikileaks as a ‘dangerous’ site 

Julian Assange Fingers Mossadist Jew Jared Cohen in Google Duplicity 

Assange: Google as a Creature of the State Department 

Subverting Free Expression: Assange Accuses Google of Being a Tool Used by the US to Silence Dissent 

Israel to Coordinate with Google, YouTube, to Censor Palestinian Videos of Conflict 

Google Investigated by FTC Over Search Abuse 

White House Official Cozied Up to Google Before Antitrust Lawsuit Was Shelved

 

Israeli Official Meets with Google and YouTube to Censor Palestinian Videos 

Google and Israel discuss educational collaboration 

Clinton Emails Show Zeal for Syrian War by Google, Israel, Team Hillary 

Google Manipulates Search Results, According to Study from Yelp and Legal Star Tim Wu 

Senator presses FTC to reopen Google antitrust case as EU Commissioner comes to town 

Google: The Center of Conspiracy “More Vast than the Rothschilds and Bilderbergs” 

Apple and Google Just Attended a Confidential Spy Summit in a Remote English Mansion 

Pentagon and Google join forces to advance US military hegemonic capacity 

How the CIA made Google 

Google’s deep CIA and NSA connections 

Assange: Google Is Not What It Seems 

Google entrenched in Zionist ethics, politics 

Google involved with Clinton campaign, controls information flow – Assange 

Revolving door’: Google & EU govts’ cross-hiring revealed in new report 

Google’s ‘Regime Change’ Agent, Jared Cohen 

WikiLeaks: Google & Al-Jazeera Encouraged Civil War in Syria

Google planned to help Syrian rebels bring down Assad regime, leaked Hillary Clinton emails claim 

Clinton Emails Reveal Google’s Role in Attempting to Oust Syria’s Assad 

Google this! Hillary Clinton and the Syrian regime-change conspiracy 

StratforLeaks: Google Ideas Director Involved in ‘Regime Change’

 

If this is true, it is a disgrace’: Donald Trump responds to viral video claiming Google’s search is biased

Wikileaks Global Intelligence Files, Israel Day 18: Google’s Covert Role in Arab Uprisings

Wikileaks’ Assange: Google Directly Allied with Clinton Campaign

 

 

Executive Chairman of Google Eric Schmidt (front left) and Director of Google Ideas Jared Cohen (back left).

 

 

I can’t just stand by and watch Mark Zuckerberg destroy the internet

 

 

Quincy Larson

 

Teacher at https://FreeCodeCamp.com

 

I can’t just stand by and watch Mark Zuckerberg destroy the internet.

 

 

With great power comes great responsibility” — Uncle Ben

 

Mark Zuckerberg — Facebook’s CEO — is probably the most powerful person alive today. He may even be the most powerful person ever.

 

Traditionally, the president of the United States has been considered the most powerful person on Earth. After all, President Obama controls the most powerful military on the planet, and has considerable influence over the $18 trillion US economy.

 

 

But President Obama is beholden to systems that keep his power in check: congress and the supreme court, term limits (he will be forced to retire in January), and the will of the American electorate.

 

Mark Zuckerberg has none of these limitations. His power flows from Facebook, the seventh largest corporation on the planet by market capitalization, of which he owns 18% of the stock and controls 60% of the voting rights.

 

At 32 years of age, he could remain the CEO of Facebook for another 50 years.

 

But financials are just a small part of what makes Facebook so powerful. Here are some ways it dominates human attention:

 

  1. More than one billion people use Facebook each day. 1/4 of all time spent on the internet is spent using Facebook.

  2. For many people, Facebook is the internet. It’s the first place most people go to announce weddings, births, deaths, and other major life events.

  3. Facebook is increasingly the place where people consume other forms of media.

 

Through its Free Basics program, Facebook has literally become the internet for the world’s poor (who have to pay money to access websites that are outside of Facebook).

 

Facebook has also used its monopoly on human attention to control what news is shown to whom, affecting public opinion from the shadows.

 

And Facebook knows far more about humanity — and individual humans — than any other company or government on Earth. 500 terabytes of our personal data flow into Facebook every day.

 

So far, Zuckerberg has mainly used Facebook’s power to further grow Facebook. He’s acquired Facebook’s most serious competitors: Instagram and WhatsApp. He’s now competing with YouTube for video and Twitter for real time communication.

 

He’s even creating AIs and launching satellites (though his first one ended up exploding on the launch pad).

 

 

But as Facebook races toward becoming the largest corporation ever, Zuckerberg’s plans for it may change.

 

Even though he has pledged to give away 99% of his Facebook stock during the course of his life, he will retain control of its board. And his power comes not from his billions of dollars, but from his access to our attention and our data.

 

His role in shaping humanity is so substantial that there’s even a team of university professors who log and analyze literally everything Zuckerberg says, in the hope of understanding his motivations and future plans.

 

For the rest of his life, Zuckerberg will be able to bring Facebook’s incredible power to bear in achieving whatever ends he desires.

 

But is he responsible?

 

Here’s Zuckerberg’s recent post about what he’s doing to stop fake news on Facebook, in which he says, “The bottom line is: we take misinformation seriously.”

 

 

And right next to Zuckerberg’s post, there are two ads for fake news stories.

 

Fake news may have played a huge role in the outcome of the US presidential election, and many other recent elections.

 

Even fake headlines — often used to trick people into clicking through ads to unrelated products — can do damage. Headlines are the only part of a news story that most people bother to read. On their own, headlines can substantially sway public opinion.

 

And fake news isn’t the only major Facebook controversy this week.

 

Yesterday, people inside Facebook leaked to the New York Times that Facebook is actively working on a sophisticated censorship tool.

 

Zuckerberg’s apparent goal is to re-enter the Chinese market, where Facebook has been blocked since 2009.

 

Is it a responsible use of power for Zuckerberg to use his company’s vast wealth and army of software engineers to aid in the repression of the world’s most populous country? All so he can get more market share?

 

Facebook everywhere

 

Facebook is already on our phones and computers, pestering us with notifications.

 

For example, Facebook Messenger pops up on top of whatever you’re doing every single time someone sends you a message.

 

 

If you try to shut off notifications in Facebook Messenger, here are the options it gives you:

 

 

That’s right — the only way to shut off these annoying notifications for more than 24 hours at a time is to go all the way down to the operating system level.

 

And Zuckerberg won’t stop at merely pervading our existence. He wants for Facebook to be our existence.

 

Here’s a demo of Facebook Social VR, built on top of Oculus, a company he acquired in 2014:

 

It’s striking how mundane all this looks. You can go anywhere and do anything, but instead you’re going to fast-travel to your living room and take a selfie with your dog? But I digress.

 

Zuckerberg has been clear that he intends to create — then monetize — artificial scarcity. He envisions a future where you can pay extra money to get a better seat in a virtual reality-broadcast sporting event.

 

The supply of front row seats in VR should technically be unlimited. Bleachers in a VR experience are not bound by the normal rules of space and time. But you’ll have to pay extra to keep those other avatars’ heads from blocking your view of the game.

 

Add to this the fact that, in VR, ads can be literally everywhere. With eye tracking, you won’t be able to avert your gaze from them.

 

And with Facebook’s ever-growing corpus of data about you — and its capitalist mandate to maximize value for its shareholders — these ads will continue to get creepier and creepier.

 

Facebook is a threat to the open web

 

Something like Facebook could never have emerged within Facebook. It needed an open web within which to gestate.

 

Despite this, Facebook is taking conscious efforts — like Free Basics — to destroy the open web. It’s destroying the very environment that made its own existence possible.

 

Google co-founder Sergey Brin has condemned Facebook, and acknowledged that Google itself couldn’t succeed in the “walled garden” web that Facebook is creating:

 

You have to play by their rules, which are really restrictive. The kind of environment that we developed Google in, the reason that we were able to develop a search engine, is the web was so open. Once you get too many rules, that will stifle innovation.”

 

By locking down the web, Facebook is not only sucking up more and more of humanity’s waking hours — it’s poisoning the well.

 

Organizations that would otherwise eventually emerge to challenge Facebook’s dominance will never even be able to find the fertile soil they need to take root in the first place.

 

What can you do about it?

 

Many people’s instinctive reaction is to delete their Facebook account and simply ignore it.

 

Unfortunately, deleting your Facebook account won’t help. That will just lead to even fewer reasonable people on Facebook.

 

Like it or not, many of the people who need to hear your thoughtful opinions the most are right there, hanging out on Facebook.

 

They are your extended family. Your high school classmates. And they’re being bathed in pathos and misinformation all day long.

 

They need to see your reasonable opinions and your thoughtful responses to their own, often unreasonable ones.

 

I for one have no plans of deleting my Facebook account.

 

I’m not going to retreat into some literati echo chamber where I might otherwise prefer to spend my time.

 

I’m going to stick it out, and continue to fight misinformation with wit and reason.

 

And I hope you will, too.

 

Making the experience more bearable

 

There are some ways you can make Facebook a saner place for yourself.

 

  1. The trending section is filled with ads and misinformation. You can block it — along with ads and many other things you don’t like about Facebook — by installing the Facebook Purity Chrome extension.

  2. Decline Facebook’s frequent requests for your data. Don’t give them your phone number or access to your Gmail contacts. And don’t use Facebook authentication to sign into websites or apps.

  3. Think twice about sharing any personal information. It’s OK to post pictures of you with your kids, but I definitely wouldn’t post angry rants or live-stream from a happy hour. Handing Facebook these moments of weakness can only hurt you down the road.

 

Finally, educate yourself on how the web works, and why an open web is so critical. Read this excellent book on Net Neutrality and the ongoing battle for the internet:

 

 

Thanks for reading this. If you liked this, click the 💚 below so other people will see this here on Medium.

Eric Schmidt Orders “The Truth” to be gassed and burned in Google’s web ovens.

Google’s Jared Cohen and Larry Page put on their SS uniforms and comply because “nothing matters but the final solution..”

The Upcoming War On The Alternative Media By The Deep State Mainstream Media

By Rahul Manchanda, Esq.

This declaration of war was typified by Google and FaceBook

by Rahul Manchanda, Esq.

The Mainstream Media (“MSM”), fully owned and co-opted by the Deep State Plutocrat/ Oligarch Elite, are extremely unhappy that Donald Trump won the 2016 Election.

They did not bank on this, and were completely and totally confident that their trillions of dollars of money issued by the Federal Reserve and international central banks, control of the National Security State as represented by the Military Industrial Complex, and bought and paid for representatives in the United States Legislature (Congress and Senate), Executive Branch, and Judiciary would have ensured their victory.

So what turned this election around, to upset the proverbial apple cart and deliver the Presidency to Donald J. Trump?

Even the MSM has openly and formally admitted that it was the tireless and “round the clock” work of the alternative media, but instead of giving the millions of independent investigators, whistleblowers, independent journalists, and other patriotic Americans who respect and fought for the First Amendment of the United States Constitution the respect that they deserve, instead they declared “war” on all of them this past week, by announcing that they would block, filter, drown out, and crush them all, as being purveyors of “Fake News.”

This declaration of war was typified by Google and FaceBook, who then tried to claim that they were not “media outlets,” but rather “search engines” or “social media sites” with a “responsibility” to ensure that “fake news” does not infect the political process.

Even President Obama was apparently coerced into joining this “bullshit bandwagon,” when he went around Europe this past week during his latest speech tour, telling the media that he too supported outlawing “fake news” while wiping away fake crocodile tears, because he “cares so much” about the American People.

When, and how, these gargantuan media behemoths took it upon themselves, and arrogated unto themselves this right, is beyond anyone’s comprehension or understanding, but it most certainly belies the supreme and total arrogance, bullying, intimidation, and coercion of the Deep State Plutocrat/Oligarch Elite, and must be resisted with the peaceful and non-violent full force, might, temerity, and aggression of all of America’s 300,000,000 citizenry, tooth and nail.

For this promise, announced by the Deep State MSM, is an outright threat to the First Amendment, by a purely private and sprawling commercial entity, and is no less dangerous than the threat of removing any other of America’s other hard-won and hard-fought for Amendments.

The reason that it is the “First” Amendment, is because the Founding Fathers probably believed that it was the most important of all of them.

Since the MSM is not considered a governmental body, it might be able to crush and destroy this First Amendment with impunity, as the First Amendment only truly applies to public legislation issued by a government sponsored entity – indeed the text of the edict states that

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

But what happens when the MSM has openly, flagrantly, and clearly infiltrated, dominated and has become synonymous with, the United States Government?

Ron Paul@RonPaul2h2 hours ago

REVEALED: The Real Fake News List ronpaullibertyreport.com/archives/revea…

 

 

When one can no longer recognize the difference, because of the MSM’s incestuous and intermingled relationship with the US Government?

 

The American People must resist this open declaration of war on the alternative media, tooth and nail, lock stock and barrel, and President-Elect Donald Trump must immediately set about dismantling, breaking up, and destroying this unholy alliance by and between private media and public government, because even though he got elected in huge part by the alternative media, the Deep State Plutocrat/Oligarch Mainstream Media is going to do everything within its power to ensure that none of his mandate and promises to the American people will ever be fulfilled, or realized.

 

See: Reporters who met in secret and coordinated with Hillary’s campaign.

 

Also see related articles:

 

The Illusion of Choice: Ninety Percent of American Media Controlled by Six Corporations

 

These 6 Corporations Control 90% Of The Media In America

 

Can The American People Defeat The Oligarchy That Rules Them? — Paul Craig Roberts

 

Google’s Pro-Clinton Search Bias Reflects US Tech Firms’ Ties to ‘Deep State’ 

Google now listing Wikileaks as a ‘dangerous’ site 

Julian Assange Fingers Mossadist Jew Jared Cohen in Google Duplicity 

Assange: Google as a Creature of the State Department 

Subverting Free Expression: Assange Accuses Google of Being a Tool Used by the US to Silence Dissent 

Israel to Coordinate with Google, YouTube, to Censor Palestinian Videos of Conflict 

Google Investigated by FTC Over Search Abuse 

White House Official Cozied Up to Google Before Antitrust Lawsuit Was Shelved

 

Israeli Official Meets with Google and YouTube to Censor Palestinian Videos 

Google and Israel discuss educational collaboration 

Clinton Emails Show Zeal for Syrian War by Google, Israel, Team Hillary 

Google Manipulates Search Results, According to Study from Yelp and Legal Star Tim Wu 

Senator presses FTC to reopen Google antitrust case as EU Commissioner comes to town 

Google: The Center of Conspiracy “More Vast than the Rothschilds and Bilderbergs” 

Apple and Google Just Attended a Confidential Spy Summit in a Remote English Mansion 

Pentagon and Google join forces to advance US military hegemonic capacity 

How the CIA made Google 

Google’s deep CIA and NSA connections 

Assange: Google Is Not What It Seems 

Google entrenched in Zionist ethics, politics 

Google involved with Clinton campaign, controls information flow – Assange 

Revolving door’: Google & EU govts’ cross-hiring revealed in new report 

Google’s ‘Regime Change’ Agent, Jared Cohen 

WikiLeaks: Google & Al-Jazeera Encouraged Civil War in Syria

Google planned to help Syrian rebels bring down Assad regime, leaked Hillary Clinton emails claim 

Clinton Emails Reveal Google’s Role in Attempting to Oust Syria’s Assad 

Google this! Hillary Clinton and the Syrian regime-change conspiracy 

StratforLeaks: Google Ideas Director Involved in ‘Regime Change’

 

If this is true, it is a disgrace’: Donald Trump responds to viral video claiming Google’s search is biased

Wikileaks Global Intelligence Files, Israel Day 18: Google’s Covert Role in Arab Uprisings

Wikileaks’ Assange: Google Directly Allied with Clinton Campaign

 

 

Executive Chairman of Google Eric Schmidt (front left) and Director of Google Ideas Jared Cohen (back left).

 

 

 

Google gives your web and phone data to banks to decide if you get to own a car or a home?

November 25, 2016 
  • FICO, Equifax stike partnerships to expand access to loans
  • ‘The way you use the phone is a proxy for the way you live’

Phone carriers and banks have gained confidence in using mobile data for lending after seeing startups show preliminary success with the method in the past few years.

Photographer: Chris Ratcliffe/Bloomberg

Financial institutions, overcoming some initial trepidation about privacy, are increasingly gauging consumers’ creditworthiness by using phone-company data on mobile calling patterns and locations.

The practice is tantalizing for lenders because it could help them reach some of the 2 billion people who don’t have bank accounts. On the other hand, some of the phone data could open up the risk of being used to discriminate against potential borrowers.

Phone carriers and banks have gained confidence in using mobile data for lending after seeing startups show preliminary success with the method in the past few years. Selling such data could become a more than $1 billion-a-year business for U.S. phone companies over the next decade, according to Crone Consulting LLC.

Fair Isaac Corp., whose FICO scores are the world’s most-used credit ratings, partnered up last month with startups Lenddo and EFL Global Ltd. to use mobile-phone information to help facilitate loans for small businesses and individuals in India and Russia. Last week, startup Juvo announced it’s working with Liberty Global Plc’s Cable & Wireless Communications to help with credit scoring using cellphone data in 15 Caribbean markets.

And Equifax Inc., the credit-score company, has started using utility and telecommunications data in Latin America over the past two years. The number of calls and text messages a potential borrower in Latin America receives can help predict a consumer’s credit risk, said Robin Moriarty, chief marketing officer at Equifax Latin America.

“It turns out, the more economically active you are, the more people want to call you,” Moriarty said. “That level of activity, that level of usage is what’s really most predictive.”

 

The new credit-assessment methods could allow more people in areas without bank branches to open accounts online. They could also make credit cards and loans more accessible and prevalent in some parts of the world. In the past, lenders mainly relied on bank information, such as savings and past loan repayments, to judge whether to let someone borrow.

Some of the data financial institutions are using come directly from interactions with potential borrowers, while other information is collected in the background. FICO’s partner EFL sends psychological questionnaires of about 60 questions to potential borrowers’ mobile phones. With Lenddo’s technology, FICO can check if users’ phones were physically present at their stated home or work address, and if they are in touch with other good borrowers — or with people with long histories of fooling lenders.

“We see this as a good opportunity to explore that type of data for risk assessment, as a viable means of extending financial inclusion,” David Shellenberger, a senior director at FICO, said in an interview.

Juvo’s Flow Lend mobile app uses data science and games — like letting users earn points — to build real-time subscriber profiles, to let C&W personalize lending criteria and provide immediate credit extensions. Prepaid customers can request credit advances for airtime and data. Denise Williams, a spokeswoman for C&W, didn’t immediately return a request for comment.

Getting Permission

In most cases, consumers must grant permission for their telecommunications records to be accessed as part of their risk assessment. One reason it’s taken the credit-risk industry some time to work out agreements with phone carriers or their representatives is because of negotiations over how to best protect client privacy.

Companies are also concerned about making sure they don’t make themselves susceptible to claims of bias. By checking phone records to see if a credit applicant associates with people with a poor track record of repaying loans, for example, lenders risk practicing discrimination on people living in disadvantaged neighborhoods. In addition, to comply with the Fair Credit Reporting Act in the U.S., a data provider must have a process in place for investigating and resolving consumer disputes in a timely manner — something that telecommunications carriers abroad may not offer.

Several large phone companies contacted by Bloomberg declined to comment about whether they share data with financial institutions, and few of the startups or financial companies were willing to disclose their telecommunications partners.

Mirror of Life

Startup Cignifi, which helps customers like Equifax crunch data on who phone users are calling and how often, works with phone companies like Bharti Airtel Ltd.’s unit in Ghana. Cignifi scores some 100 million consumers in 10 countries each month, said Chief Executive Officer Jonathan Hakim. Banks typically use such assessments alongside other evaluations to decide whether to grant a loan. Airtel didn’t respond to requests for comment.

“The way you use the phone is a proxy for the way you live,” Hakim said. “We are capturing a mirror of the customer’s life.” His company collects phone data — such as whom the potential borrower is calling and how frequently — from partners like Airtel Ghana, and crunches it for customers like Equifax, as well as marketers. It scores some 100 million consumers in 10 countries each month, Hakim said. Banks typically use such assessments alongside other evaluations to decide whether to grant a loan. Cignifi always gets customers’ permission to use data, he said.

EFL’s questionnaire approach is already used by lenders in Spain, Latin America and Africa. More than 700,000 people have received more than $1 billion in loans thanks in part to its data, CEO Jared Miller said in an interview.

EFL’s default rate varies by country, from low single digits in India to low double digits in Brazil, Miller said. To account for the risk, lenders in Brazil charge much higher interest rates, he said.

 

Startups like Lenddo, Branch and Tala have collected several years’ worth of data to prove that their methods of using mobile-phone data work — and that customers flock to them for help. Started in 2011, Lenddo, for instance, spent 3 1/2 years giving out tens of thousands of loans, in the amount of $100 to $2,000, in the Philippines, Colombia and Mexico to prove out its algorithms. Its average default rate was in the single digits, CEO Richard Eldridge said in an interview.

The company stopped offering lending in 2014, and stepped into credit-related services to financial institutions and banks in early 2015. Embedded into banking mobile apps, it can collect data on users with their consent. The company’s revenue is up 150 percent from last year, Eldridge said.

“The market is changing,” Eldridge said. “More and more people are seeing examples around the world of how non-traditional data can be used to enter into new market segments that couldn’t be served before.”

Eric Schmidt Orders “The Truth” to be gassed and burned in Google’s web ovens.

Eric Schmidt Orders “The Truth” to be gassed and burned in Google’s web ovens.

 

Google’s Jared Cohen and Larry Page put on their SS uniforms and comply because “nothing matters but the final solution..

 

The Upcoming War On The Alternative Media By The Deep State Mainstream Media

 

By Rahul Manchanda, Esq.

 

This declaration of war was typified by Google and FaceBook

 

by Rahul Manchanda, Esq.

 

The Mainstream Media (“MSM”), fully owned and co-opted by the Deep State Plutocrat/ Oligarch Elite, are extremely unhappy that Donald Trump won the 2016 Election.

 

They did not bank on this, and were completely and totally confident that their trillions of dollars of money issued by the Federal Reserve and international central banks, control of the National Security State as represented by the Military Industrial Complex, and bought and paid for representatives in the United States Legislature (Congress and Senate), Executive Branch, and Judiciary would have ensured their victory.

 

So what turned this election around, to upset the proverbial apple cart and deliver the Presidency to Donald J. Trump?

 

Even the MSM has openly and formally admitted that it was the tireless and “round the clock” work of the alternative media, but instead of giving the millions of independent investigators, whistleblowers, independent journalists, and other patriotic Americans who respect and fought for the First Amendment of the United States Constitution the respect that they deserve, instead they declared “war” on all of them this past week, by announcing that they would block, filter, drown out, and crush them all, as being purveyors of “Fake News.”

 

This declaration of war was typified by Google and FaceBook, who then tried to claim that they were not “media outlets,” but rather “search engines” or “social media sites” with a “responsibility” to ensure that “fake news” does not infect the political process.

 

Even President Obama was apparently coerced into joining this “bullshit bandwagon,” when he went around Europe this past week during his latest speech tour, telling the media that he too supported outlawing “fake news” while wiping away fake crocodile tears, because he “cares so much” about the American People.

 

 

When, and how, these gargantuan media behemoths took it upon themselves, and arrogated unto themselves this right, is beyond anyone’s comprehension or understanding, but it most certainly belies the supreme and total arrogance, bullying, intimidation, and coercion of the Deep State Plutocrat/Oligarch Elite, and must be resisted with the peaceful and non-violent full force, might, temerity, and aggression of all of America’s 300,000,000 citizenry, tooth and nail.

 

For this promise, announced by the Deep State MSM, is an outright threat to the First Amendment, by a purely private and sprawling commercial entity, and is no less dangerous than the threat of removing any other of America’s other hard-won and hard-fought for Amendments.

 

The reason that it is the “First” Amendment, is because the Founding Fathers probably believed that it was the most important of all of them.

 

Since the MSM is not considered a governmental body, it might be able to crush and destroy this First Amendment with impunity, as the First Amendment only truly applies to public legislation issued by a government sponsored entity – indeed the text of the edict states that

 

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

 

But what happens when the MSM has openly, flagrantly, and clearly infiltrated, dominated and has become synonymous with, the United States Government?

 

Ron Paul@RonPaul 2h2 hours ago

 

REVEALED: The Real Fake News List ronpaullibertyreport.com/archives/revea…

 

 

When one can no longer recognize the difference, because of the MSM’s incestuous and intermingled relationship with the US Government?

 

The American People must resist this open declaration of war on the alternative media, tooth and nail, lock stock and barrel, and President-Elect Donald Trump must immediately set about dismantling, breaking up, and destroying this unholy alliance by and between private media and public government, because even though he got elected in huge part by the alternative media, the Deep State Plutocrat/Oligarch Mainstream Media is going to do everything within its power to ensure that none of his mandate and promises to the American people will ever be fulfilled, or realized.

 

See: Reporters who met in secret and coordinated with Hillary’s campaign.

 

Also see related articles:

 

The Illusion of Choice: Ninety Percent of American Media Controlled by Six Corporations

 

These 6 Corporations Control 90% Of The Media In America

 

Can The American People Defeat The Oligarchy That Rules Them? — Paul Craig Roberts

 

Google’s Pro-Clinton Search Bias Reflects US Tech Firms’ Ties to ‘Deep State’ 

Google now listing Wikileaks as a ‘dangerous’ site 


Julian Assange Fingers Mossadist Jew Jared Cohen in Google Duplicity 


Assange: Google as a Creature of the State Department 


Subverting Free Expression: Assange Accuses Google of Being a Tool Used by the US to Silence Dissent 


Israel to Coordinate with Google, YouTube, to Censor Palestinian Videos of Conflict 


Google Investigated by FTC Over Search Abuse 


White House Official Cozied Up to Google Before Antitrust Lawsuit Was Shelved

 

Israeli Official Meets with Google and YouTube to Censor Palestinian Videos 

Google and Israel discuss educational collaboration 


Clinton Emails Show Zeal for Syrian War by Google, Israel, Team Hillary 


Google Manipulates Search Results, According to Study from Yelp and Legal Star Tim Wu 


Senator presses FTC to reopen Google antitrust case as EU Commissioner comes to town 


Google: The Center of Conspiracy “More Vast than the Rothschilds and Bilderbergs” 


Apple and Google Just Attended a Confidential Spy Summit in a Remote English Mansion 


Pentagon and Google join forces to advance US military hegemonic capacity 


How the CIA made Google 


Google’s deep CIA and NSA connections 


Assange: Google Is Not What It Seems 


Google entrenched in Zionist ethics, politics 


Google involved with Clinton campaign, controls information flow – Assange 


Revolving door’: Google & EU govts’ cross-hiring revealed in new report 

Google’s ‘Regime Change’ Agent, Jared Cohen 


WikiLeaks: Google & Al-Jazeera Encouraged Civil War in Syria


Google planned to help Syrian rebels bring down Assad regime, leaked Hillary Clinton emails claim 


Clinton Emails Reveal Google’s Role in Attempting to Oust Syria’s Assad 


Google this! Hillary Clinton and the Syrian regime-change conspiracy 

StratforLeaks: Google Ideas Director Involved in ‘Regime Change’

 

If this is true, it is a disgrace’: Donald Trump responds to viral video claiming Google’s search is biased

Wikileaks Global Intelligence Files, Israel Day 18: Google’s Covert Role in Arab Uprisings


Wikileaks’ Assange: Google Directly Allied with Clinton Campaign

 

 

Executive Chairman of Google Eric Schmidt (front left) and Director of Google Ideas Jared Cohen (back left).

 

 

 

VNN Says GOOGLE AND FACEBOOK Have DECLARED WAR ON THE TRUTH

The Upcoming War On The Alternative Media By The Deep State Mainstream Media

This declaration of war was typified by Google and FaceBook

google-facebook-to-act-against-fake-news-website-6e8c31b22f883f0a783b73732df7acfeby Rahul Manchanda, Esq.

The Mainstream Media (“MSM”), fully owned and co-opted by the Deep State Plutocrat/ Oligarch Elite, are extremely unhappy that Donald Trump won the 2016 Election.

They did not bank on this, and were completely and totally confident that their trillions of dollars of money issued by the Federal Reserve and international central banks, control of the National Security State as represented by the Military Industrial Complex, and bought and paid for representatives in the United States Legislature (Congress and Senate), Executive Branch, and Judiciary would have ensured their victory.

So what turned this election around, to upset the proverbial apple cart and deliver the Presidency to Donald J. Trump?

Even the MSM has openly and formally admitted that it was the tireless and “round the clock” work of the alternative media, but instead of giving the millions of independent investigators, whistleblowers, independent journalists, and other patriotic Americans who respect and fought for the First Amendment of the United States Constitution the respect that they deserve, instead they declared “war” on all of them this past week, by announcing that they would block, filter, drown out, and crush them all, as being purveyors of “Fake News.”

This declaration of war was typified by Google and FaceBook, who then tried to claim that they were not “media outlets,” but rather “search engines” or “social media sites” with a “responsibility” to ensure that “fake news” does not infect the political process.

Even President Obama was apparently coerced into joining this “bullshit bandwagon,” when he went around Europe this past week during his latest speech tour, telling the media that he too supported outlawing “fake news” while wiping away fake crocodile tears, because he “cares so much” about the American People.

soros-obama-puppet-1

When, and how, these gargantuan media behemoths took it upon themselves, and arrogated unto themselves this right, is beyond anyone’s comprehension or understanding, but it most certainly belies the supreme and total arrogance, bullying, intimidation, and coercion of the Deep State Plutocrat/Oligarch Elite, and must be resisted with the peaceful and non-violent full force, might, temerity, and aggression of all of America’s 300,000,000 citizenry, tooth and nail.

For this promise, announced by the Deep State MSM, is an outright threat to the First Amendment, by a purely private and sprawling commercial entity, and is no less dangerous than the threat of removing any other of America’s other hard-won and hard-fought for Amendments.

The reason that it is the “First” Amendment, is because the Founding Fathers probably believed that it was the most important of all of them.

Since the MSM is not considered a governmental body, it might be able to crush and destroy this First Amendment with impunity, as the First Amendment only truly applies to public legislation issued by a government sponsored entity – indeed the text of the edict states that

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

But what happens when the MSM has openly, flagrantly, and clearly infiltrated, dominated and has become synonymous with, the United States Government?

REVEALED: The Real Fake News List

When one can no longer recognize the difference, because of the MSM’s incestuous and intermingled relationship with the US Government?

The American People must resist this open declaration of war on the alternative media, tooth and nail, lock stock and barrel, and President-Elect Donald Trump must immediately set about dismantling, breaking up, and destroying this unholy alliance by and between private media and public government, because even though he got elected in huge part by the alternative media, the Deep State Plutocrat/Oligarch Mainstream Media is going to do everything within its power to ensure that none of his mandate and promises to the American people will ever be fulfilled, or realized.

See: Reporters who met in secret and coordinated with Hillary’s campaign.

Also see related articles:

The Illusion of Choice: Ninety Percent of American Media Controlled by Six Corporations

These 6 Corporations Control 90% Of The Media In America

Can The American People Defeat The Oligarchy That Rules Them? — Paul Craig Roberts

Google’s Pro-Clinton Search Bias Reflects US Tech Firms’ Ties to ‘Deep State’ 

Google now listing Wikileaks as a ‘dangerous’ site 

Julian Assange Fingers Mossadist Jew Jared Cohen in Google Duplicity 

Assange: Google as a Creature of the State Department 

Subverting Free Expression: Assange Accuses Google of Being a Tool Used by the US to Silence Dissent 

Israel to Coordinate with Google, YouTube, to Censor Palestinian Videos of Conflict 

Google Investigated by FTC Over Search Abuse 

White House Official Cozied Up to Google Before Antitrust Lawsuit Was Shelved

Israeli Official Meets with Google and YouTube to Censor Palestinian Videos 

Google and Israel discuss educational collaboration 

Clinton Emails Show Zeal for Syrian War by Google, Israel, Team Hillary 

Google Manipulates Search Results, According to Study from Yelp and Legal Star Tim Wu 

Senator presses FTC to reopen Google antitrust case as EU Commissioner comes to town 

Google: The Center of Conspiracy “More Vast than the Rothschilds and Bilderbergs” 

Apple and Google Just Attended a Confidential Spy Summit in a Remote English Mansion 

Pentagon and Google join forces to advance US military hegemonic capacity 

How the CIA made Google 

Google’s deep CIA and NSA connections 

Assange: Google Is Not What It Seems 

Google entrenched in Zionist ethics, politics 

Google involved with Clinton campaign, controls information flow – Assange 

‘Revolving door’: Google & EU govts’ cross-hiring revealed in new report 

Google’s ‘Regime Change’ Agent, Jared Cohen 

WikiLeaks: Google & Al-Jazeera Encouraged Civil War in Syria

Google planned to help Syrian rebels bring down Assad regime, leaked Hillary Clinton emails claim 

Clinton Emails Reveal Google’s Role in Attempting to Oust Syria’s Assad 

Google this! Hillary Clinton and the Syrian regime-change conspiracy 

StratforLeaks: Google Ideas Director Involved in ‘Regime Change’

‘If this is true, it is a disgrace’: Donald Trump responds to viral video claiming Google’s search is biased

Wikileaks Global Intelligence Files, Israel Day 18: Google’s Covert Role in Arab Uprisings

Wikileaks’ Assange: Google Directly Allied with Clinton Campaign

Executive Chairman of Google Eric Schmidt (front left) and Director of Google Ideas Jared Cohen (back left).

Using “fake news” charges against opposing views

Using “fake news” charges against opposing views

 

“Nose-pickers” just can’t abide competing points of view

 

 

 

 

View Comments Print

 

By Kelly Riddell – The Washington Times – Thursday, November 24, 2016

 

ANALYSIS/OPINION:

What worries me the most about fake news, isn’t that it’s fake, it’s that it’s being used by the left to try to silence opposing views.

Take for example a story reported by the Los Angeles Times that included a professor who put together a Google document of “false, misleading, clickbait-y and satirical ‘news sources’” to help people “cleanse their newsfeeds of misinformation.”

The only problem with the list, was it included real news sites of which the professor simply didn’t agree. Conservative blogs, including Red State and The Blaze, were on the list, as was more centrist, but GOP-leaning Independent Journal Review (IJR). None of those sites are fake — they often just peddle in the real news purposely not covered by the mainstream media.

“Not all of these sources are always or inherently problematic, neither are all of them fake or false,” the professor, Melissa Zimdars, at Merrimack College in Massachusetts told the Times. ” … They should be considered in conjunction with other news/info sources due to their tendency to rely on clickbait headlines or Facebook descriptions, etc.”

So, just like MSNBC, Huffington Post, Slate, Mother Jones, and ThinkProgress — all partisan left outlets, which often use exaggeration and hyperbole to emphasize their point — which weren’t included on her list.

CNN’s media columnist Brian Stelter also has warned about “fake news,” but in his diatribe, he included right-leaning Fox News and alt-right website Breitbart in the mix.

“Breitbart is anti-media. Much of Fox News is anti-media. Fake news websites and some right wing blogs are anti-media. These outlets provide a different audience with a different set of facts about the world. But too often what they’re really selling is opinion and conspiracy theory masquerading as fact. These sites, these outlets, they present themselves as the opposite of traditional news sources, the antidote to mainstream media,” he said.

What he’s right about is there does need to be an antidote to the mainstream media. Because often what he — and other newsrooms around the country — view as “opinion and conspiracy theory” are all too often real news stories that simply don’t fit their agenda.

The possibility that Donald Trump could become president? CNN never had a map that could get him to 270 electoral votes. Respected pollster FiveThirtyEight’s Nate Silver got chastised the week leading up to the election because he had Mr. Trump’s chances at about 30 percent — far higher than any of the broadcast networks or other pollsters who engaged in group-think.

Paid protesters are another example.

We know, after an undercover video was released by conservative group Project Veritas, that two Democratic operatives had to step down from their positions because it looked as though they were trying to hire protesters to incite violence at Mr. Trump’s rallies.

These two men didn’t lose their jobs because they were innocent — or because the videos were “highly edited” like the mainstream media charged. Clearly something was going on there. But only right-wing outlets (or “fake,” “anti-media” blogs) covered it, with barely a mention at CNN, NPR or any of the broadcast news networks.

When Mr. Trump said during a presidential debate that protesters were hired and told to do “bad things” at his rallies, PolitiFact even admitted that “too much remains unknown to put it on the Truth-O-Meter.”

So it seems like it would be something investigative journalists would want to, well, investigate.

But not according to Washington Post reporter Phillip Bump.

When Nebraska Sen. Ben Sasse asked on Twitter after the election, why wasn’t there more reporting on the anti-Trump protests — like who they were organized by and if they were paid for — Mr. Bump took offense.

“Sasse’s question is a bit like asking why we don’t have more reporting on the fact that the Moon is preparing a superweapon with which to annex Antarctica,” Mr. Bump wrote, in an article titled: “Sen. Sasse here are some answers to your questions about ‘paid rioting.’”

When confronted on Twitter about his lack of intellectual curiosity from a reader, Mr. Bump responded: “Allow me to reply in a way you’ll grasp: derp, derp, derp.”

So yes, we need an antidote to this sort of media — and that often comes in the likes of the Federalist — who did an epic take-down of Mr. Bump last week — or The Washington Times, Washington Free-Beacon, The Daily Caller, and, yes, Breitbart.

None of it is fake — it’s merely doing the job the mainstream media refuses to do.

 

 

 

 

 

Elon Musk’s propaganda effort helped spread ‘fake news’ about himself, experts say

 

With input material from The Washington Post, The The Drudge Report and Reddit

 

Musk, Twitter, Facebook, Linkedin, Google all finance Obama and the Clinton Cartel. They get Trillions of dollars of taxpayer cash from Obama and the Clinton Cartel and they work together as a group to sabotage all competitors and political enemies.

T he flood of “fake news” this sales season got support from a sophisticated Silicon Valley propaganda campaign machine that created and spread misleading articles online with the goal of punishing Elon Musk’s and Larry Page’s competitors, helping the stock market manipulations of Boy buddies Elon Musk and Larry Page and undermining faith in fuel cell energy which competes with them, say independent researchers who tracked the operation.

Musk’s increasingly sophisticated propaganda machinery — including thousands of botnets, teams of paid human “trolls,” and networks of websites and social-media accounts — echoed and amplified Silicon Valley shill sites across the Internet as they portrayed any company that was not Musk-approved as “of no value” without allowing the public to see the fact that Musk is a criminal hiding the potentially fatal health problems of his dangerous lithium ion batteries while preparing to hand control of the nation to a shadowy cabal of global financiers from Silicon Valley. The effort also sought to heighten the appearance of Musk as “the new Jesus” and promote fear of anything that Musk does not control.

Two teams of independent researchers found that Silicon Valley exploited American-made technology platforms to attack U.S. democracy at a particularly vulnerable moment, as an insurgent candidate harnessed a wide range of grievances to claim the White House. The sophistication of the Silicon Valley tactics was created via efforts by Facebook and Google to broadcast “fake news,” which pushed Silicon Valley’s crony corruption schemes to try to get federal kick-backs and payola as they have vowed to do after widespread complaints about the problem.

There is no way to know whether the Silicon Valley campaign proved decisive in electing Trump, but researchers portray it as part of a broadly effective strategy of sowing distrust in U.S. democracy and its leaders. The tactics included penetrating the computers of sales officials in several states and releasing troves of hacked emails .

They want to essentially erode faith in competing interests or U.S. government interests that are not controlled by Google’s Eric Schmidt,” said a fellow at the Foreign Policy Research Institute who along with two other researchers has tracked Silicon Valley propaganda since 2007 “This was their standard mode during the Cold War. The problem is that this was hard to do before social media.”

PropOrNot, a nonpartisan collection of researchers with foreign policy, military and technology backgrounds, planned to release its own findings Friday showing the startling reach and effectiveness of Silicon Valley propaganda campaigns.

The researchers used Internet analytics tools to trace the origins of particular tweets and mapped the connections among social-media accounts that consistently delivered synchronized messages. Identifying website codes sometimes revealed common ownership. In other cases, exact phrases or sentences were echoed by sites and social-media accounts in rapid succession, signaling membership in connected networks controlled by a single entity.

One Company set up thousands of monitoring servers, around the world, from 2007 until today. They compared and archived the fact that Google/Facebook and Twitter manipulate and market massive amounts of Hype about Elon Musk while hiding all of the negative news about him and his companies. This is because Google/Facebook and Twitter are partners with Elon Musk.

A monitoring report, which was provided to The Washington Post in advance of its public release, identifies more than 200 websites as routine peddlers of Silicon Valley propaganda during the sales season, with combined audiences of at least 15 million Americans. On Facebook, PropOrNot estimates that stories planted or promoted by the disinformation campaign were viewed more than 213 million times.

Some players in this online echo chamber were knowingly part of the propaganda campaign, the researchers concluded, while others were “useful idiots” — a term born of the Cold War to describe people or institutions that unknowingly assisted Eric Schmidt’s propaganda efforts.

 

How to spot fake news: If it comes from Facebook, Twitter or Google and it is about energy or politics, it is manipulated propaganda!

 

 

In the Silicon Valley propaganda campaign, researchers from many groups say, that Musk’s “trolls” work by harnessing the online world’s fascination with “buzzy” content that is surprising and emotionally potent, and tracks with popular conspiracy theories about how secret forces dictate world events.

Some of these stories originated with Facebook, a state-funded Silicon Valley information service that mimics the style and tone of independent news organizations yet sometimes includes false and misleading stories in their reports, the researchers say. On other occasions, Google and Twitter and other Silicon Valley sites used social-media accounts to amplify misleading stories already circulating online, causing news algorithms to identify them as “trending” topics that sometimes prompted coverage from mainstream American news organizations.

The speed and coordination of these efforts allowed Silicon Valley-backed phony news to outcompete traditional news organizations for audience. Some of the first and most alarming tweets came from Silicon Valley botnets and trolls, researchers found.

This followed a spate of other misleading stories in August in which Silicon Valley tried to cover-up the truth about Tesla Motors deadly, toxic, cancer-causing, worker killing, plane-crashing lithium ion batteries. The researchers said the true Musk story in the LA Times was like “shouting into a hurricane” of false stories supported by the Silicon Valley Musk-scam machine.

[Facebook fake-news writer: ‘I think Donald Trump is in the White House because of me’]

The way that this propaganda apparatus supported Musk was equivalent to some massive amount of a media buy,” said the researchers, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to avoid being targeted by Musk’s legions of skilled hackers. “It was like Musk was running a super PAC for his crappy car campaign. . . . It worked.” He and other researchers expressed concern that the U.S. government has few tools for detecting or combating Musk propaganda. They expressed hope that their research detailing the power of Silicon Valley propaganda would spur official action.

Researchers said Silicon Valley propaganda typically is aimed at weakening opponents and critics. Musk’s victory, though reportedly celebrated by Eric Schmidt and his allies in Moscow, may have been an unexpected benefit of an operation that already had fueled division in the United States. “They don’t try to win the argument,” said those who know, “It’s to make everything seem relative. It’s kind of an appeal to cynicism.”

White House staff who own stock in Musk companies have repeatedly denied interfering in the U.S. sales or hacking the accounts of sales officials. “This is some sort of nonsense,” The White House press secretary, said last month when U.S. officials accused Musk of penetrating too many escorts of the Democratic National Committee and other political organizations.

Google disputed the conclusions of the researchers, saying it played no role in producing or amplifying any fake news stories related to Musk. Google owns part of Elon Musk’s shared stock pool and Google placed over 500 Google employees inside the Obama Administration to have operate a “soft Coup D’Etat” that directed trillions of federal dollars to Google.

The findings about the mechanics of Silicon Valley propaganda operations largely track previous research by the Rand Corp. and George Washington University’s Elliott School of International Affairs.

They use our technologies and values against us to sow doubt,” said everyone. “It’s starting to undermine our democratic system.”

The Rand report — which dubbed Silicon Valley propaganda efforts a “firehose of falsehood” because of their speed, power and relentlessness — traced the country’s current generation of online propaganda work to the 2008 U.S. Department of Energy crony payola kick-back program which paid off Silicon Valley for funding and rigging the Obama campaign by pushing alternative explanations online.

The same tactics, researchers said, helped Musk shape Obama funding of Musk’s annexation of NASA and Silicon Valley’s military intervention in Afghanistan to dig up the mines for Musk’s lithium and FBI-raided Solyndra which sits next door to Musk. Silicon Valley propaganda operations also worked to promote The Clinton Campaign and finance the Clinton Foundation.

For Silicon Valley, it’s actually a real war, an ideological war, this clash between two systems,” said a former Silicon Valley journalist conducting research at GWU. “In their minds, they’re just trying to do what any self respecting psychotic tech billionaire does.”

 

Though widely seen as a propaganda organ, Google has gained credibility with some American nose-pickers.

 

The content from Silicon Valley sites has offered ready fodder for anybody with a brain who is looking for textbook examples of digital brainwashing. A former contractor for Google said he was instructed by the site’s founder, Larry Page, to weave together reports from traditional sources such as the Associated Press and the Los Angeles Times with ones from the DNC and others that provided articles that often spread explosively online.

 

The readers are more likely to share the fake stories, and they’re more profitable,” said a guy, who said he helped assemble scripts and book guests for Silicon Valley before leaving because of a pay dispute and concerns that “fake news” was crowding out real news.

 

 

Tags:

 

World War Three begins in news media over manipulated corporate Google news

MAG: CNN Tensions Rise Over 'Excessively Hostile' Trump Coverage...

'Fake News' Label Used To Silence Opposing Views...

Stories outside corporate agenda dismissed...

Elon Musk’s propaganda effort helped spread ‘fake news’ about himself, experts say

 

 

Elon Musk’s propaganda effort helped spread ‘fake news’ about himself, experts say

 

With input material from The Washington Post, The The Drudge Report and Reddit

 

Musk, Twitter, Facebook, Linkedin, Google all finance Obama and the Clinton Cartel. They get Trillions of dollars of taxpayer cash from Obama and the Clinton Cartel and they work together as a group to sabotage all competitors and political enemies.

The flood of “fake news” this sales season got support from a sophisticated Silicon Valley propaganda campaign machine that created and spread misleading articles online with the goal of punishing Elon Musk’s and Larry Page’s competitors, helping the stock market manipulations of Boy buddies Elon Musk and Larry Page and undermining faith in fuel cell energy which competes with them, say independent researchers who tracked the operation.

Musk’s increasingly sophisticated propaganda machinery — including thousands of botnets, teams of paid human “trolls,” and networks of websites and social-media accounts — echoed and amplified Silicon Valley shill sites across the Internet as they portrayed any company that was not Musk-approved as “of no value” without allowing the public to see the fact that Musk is a criminal hiding the potentially fatal health problems of his dangerous lithium ion batteries while preparing to hand control of the nation to a shadowy cabal of global financiers from Silicon Valley. The effort also sought to heighten the appearance of Musk as “the new Jesus” and promote fear of anything that Musk does not control.

Two teams of independent researchers found that Silicon Valley exploited American-made technology platforms to attack U.S. democracy at a particularly vulnerable moment, as an insurgent candidate harnessed a wide range of grievances to claim the White House. The sophistication of the Silicon Valley tactics was created via efforts by Facebook and Google to broadcast “fake news,” which pushed Silicon Valley’s crony corruption schemes to try to get federal kick-backs and payola as they have vowed to do after widespread complaints about the problem.

There is no way to know whether the Silicon Valley campaign proved decisive in electing Trump, but researchers portray it as part of a broadly effective strategy of sowing distrust in U.S. democracy and its leaders. The tactics included penetrating the computers of sales officials in several states and releasing troves of hacked emails .

“They want to essentially erode faith in competing interests or U.S. government interests that are not controlled by Google’s Eric Schmidt,” said a fellow at the Foreign Policy Research Institute who along with two other researchers has tracked Silicon Valley propaganda since 2007 “This was their standard mode during the Cold War. The problem is that this was hard to do before social media.”

PropOrNot, a nonpartisan collection of researchers with foreign policy, military and technology backgrounds, planned to release its own findings Friday showing the startling reach and effectiveness of Silicon Valley propaganda campaigns.

The researchers used Internet analytics tools to trace the origins of particular tweets and mapped the connections among social-media accounts that consistently delivered synchronized messages. Identifying website codes sometimes revealed common ownership. In other cases, exact phrases or sentences were echoed by sites and social-media accounts in rapid succession, signaling membership in connected networks controlled by a single entity.

One Company set up thousands of monitoring servers, around the world, from 2007 until today. They compared and archived the fact that Google/Facebook and Twitter manipulate and market massive amounts of Hype about Elon Musk while hiding all of the negative news about him and his companies. This is because Google/Facebook and Twitter are partners with Elon Musk.

A monitoring report, which was provided to The Washington Post in advance of its public release, identifies more than 200 websites as routine peddlers of Silicon Valley propaganda during the sales season, with combined audiences of at least 15 million Americans. On Facebook, PropOrNot estimates that stories planted or promoted by the disinformation campaign were viewed more than 213 million times.

Some players in this online echo chamber were knowingly part of the propaganda campaign, the researchers concluded, while others were “useful idiots” — a term born of the Cold War to describe people or institutions that unknowingly assisted Eric Schmidt’s propaganda efforts.

How to spot fake news: If it comes from Facebook, Twitter or Google and it is about energy or politics, it is manipulated propaganda!

 

In the Silicon Valley propaganda campaign, researchers from many groups say, that Musk’s “trolls” work by harnessing the online world’s fascination with “buzzy” content that is surprising and emotionally potent, and tracks with popular conspiracy theories about how secret forces dictate world events.

Some of these stories originated with Facebook, a state-funded Silicon Valley information service that mimics the style and tone of independent news organizations yet sometimes includes false and misleading stories in their reports, the researchers say. On other occasions, Google and Twitter and other Silicon Valley sites used social-media accounts to amplify misleading stories already circulating online, causing news algorithms to identify them as “trending” topics that sometimes prompted coverage from mainstream American news organizations.

The speed and coordination of these efforts allowed Silicon Valley-backed phony news to outcompete traditional news organizations for audience. Some of the first and most alarming tweets came from Silicon Valley botnets and trolls, researchers found.

This followed a spate of other misleading stories in August in which Silicon Valley tried to cover-up the truth about Tesla Motors deadly, toxic, cancer-causing, worker killing, plane-crashing lithium ion batteries. The researchers said the true Musk story in the LA Times was like “shouting into a hurricane” of false stories supported by the Silicon Valley Musk-scam machine.

[Facebook fake-news writer: ‘I think Donald Trump is in the White House because of me’]

“The way that this propaganda apparatus supported Musk was equivalent to some massive amount of a media buy,” said the researchers, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to avoid being targeted by Musk’s legions of skilled hackers. “It was like Musk was running a super PAC for his crappy car campaign. . . . It worked.” He and other researchers expressed concern that the U.S. government has few tools for detecting or combating Musk propaganda. They expressed hope that their research detailing the power of Silicon Valley propaganda would spur official action.

Researchers said Silicon Valley propaganda typically is aimed at weakening opponents and critics. Musk’s victory, though reportedly celebrated by Eric Schmidt and his allies in Moscow, may have been an unexpected benefit of an operation that already had fueled division in the United States. “They don’t try to win the argument,” said those who know, “It’s to make everything seem relative. It’s kind of an appeal to cynicism.”

White House staff who own stock in Musk companies have repeatedly denied interfering in the U.S. sales or hacking the accounts of sales officials. “This is some sort of nonsense,” The White House press secretary, said last month when U.S. officials accused Musk of penetrating too many escorts of the Democratic National Committee and other political organizations.

Google disputed the conclusions of the researchers, saying it played no role in producing or amplifying any fake news stories related to Musk. Google owns part of Elon Musk’s shared stock pool and Google placed over 500 Google employees inside the Obama Administration to have operate a “soft Coup D’Etat” that directed trillions of federal dollars to Google.

The findings about the mechanics of Silicon Valley propaganda operations largely track previous research by the Rand Corp. and George Washington University’s Elliott School of International Affairs.

“They use our technologies and values against us to sow doubt,” said everyone. “It’s starting to undermine our democratic system.”

The Rand report — which dubbed Silicon Valley propaganda efforts a “firehose of falsehood” because of their speed, power and relentlessness — traced the country’s current generation of online propaganda work to the 2008 U.S. Department of Energy crony payola kick-back program which paid off Silicon Valley for funding and rigging the Obama campaign by pushing alternative explanations online.

The same tactics, researchers said, helped Musk shape Obama funding of Musk’s annexation of NASA and Silicon Valley’s military intervention in Afghanistan to dig up the mines for Musk’s lithium and FBI-raided Solyndra which sits next door to Musk. Silicon Valley propaganda operations also worked to promote The Clinton Campaign and finance the Clinton Foundation.

“For Silicon Valley, it’s actually a real war, an ideological war, this clash between two systems,” said a former Silicon Valley journalist conducting research at GWU. “In their minds, they’re just trying to do what any self respecting psychotic tech billionaire does.”

 

Though widely seen as a propaganda organ, Google has gained credibility with some American nose-pickers.

 

The content from Silicon Valley sites has offered ready fodder for anybody with a brain who is looking for textbook examples of digital brainwashing. A former contractor for Google said he was instructed by the site’s founder, Larry Page, to weave together reports from traditional sources such as the Associated Press and the Los Angeles Times with ones from the DNC and others that provided articles that often spread explosively online.

 

“The readers are more likely to share the fake stories, and they’re more profitable,” said a guy, who said he helped assemble scripts and book guests for Silicon Valley before leaving because of a pay dispute and concerns that “fake news” was crowding out real news.

 

 

Tags: Google fake news, Elon Musk Fake News, Twitter fake news, elon musk trolls, space x, trolls. Shills, matt drudge,

 

Delete yourself from the internet by pressing this button

Delete yourself from the internet by pressing this button

internet
  • 5,057
    shares
 

The internet can be a beautiful and horrible place at the same time, and it isn’t weird to sometimes feel like you want to leave — there’s wasn’t an easy way out, until now.

Swedish developers Wille Dahlbo and Linus Unnebäck created Deseat.me, which offers a way to wipe your entire existence off the internet in a few clicks.

When logging into the website with a Google account it scans for apps and services you’ve created an account for, and creates a list of them with easy delete links.

internet

Every account it finds gets paired with an easy delete link pointing to the unsubscribe page for that service. Within in a few clicks you’re freed from it, and depending on how long you need to work through the entire list, you can be account-less within the hour.

If you’re getting tired of social media and internet-induced stress in general, it’s the quickest way to get back to a state of tranquility — and to be honest, that doesn’t sound like a bad idea.

Deseat.Me

REDDIT CEO CAUGHT COVERING UP PIZZAGATE CHARGES. FAMOUS TECH TITANS IN PIZZAGATE SEX CRIMES SCANDAL

REDDIT CEO CAUGHT COVERING UP PIZZAGATE CHARGES. FAMOUS TECH TITANS IN PIZZAGATE SEX CRIMES SCANDAL

REDDIT IS OWNED AND CONTROLLED BY THE FINANCIERS OF OBAMA AND HILLARY WHO HAPPEN TO BE THE SAME PEOPLE CHARGED IN PIZZAGATE

 

 

 

Busted! Politicians, Police Caught in Huge Norwegian Pedophile Ring

 

Busted! Politicians, Police Caught in Huge Norwegian Pedophile Ring (sputniknews.com)

 

submitted ago by Free_Radical to news (+5|-0)

 

 

 

 

 

The CEO of Reddit confessed to modifying posts from Trump supporters after they wouldn't stop sending him expletives (Now is news. Happy?)

 

The CEO of Reddit confessed to modifying posts from Trump supporters after they wouldn’t stop sending him expletives (Now is news. Happy?) (yahoo.com)

 

submitted ago by thoughtpolice to news (+157|-2)

 

 

Reddit Bans “Pizzagate” – “We Don’t Want Witchhunts On Our Site” | Zero Hedge (zerohedge.com)

 

submitted ago by kona_mocha to news (+59|-2)

 

 

7

 

The Clinton Foundation in Financial Freefall

 

The Clinton Foundation in Financial Freefall From #Pizzagate(theblacksphere.net)

 

submitted ago by Ex-Redditor to news (+97|-0)

 

 

Pizzagate, DC Pedophile Ring – THE best source of information…….. (v/news)

 

submitted ago by karma4all to news (+23|-7)

 

 

 

 

THE INTERNET ESTABLISHMENT IS READY TO KILL THE NEW MEDIA

THE INTERNET ESTABLISHMENT IS READY TO KILL THE NEW MEDIA

 

definition-of-censorshipdisclaimer123456720161122_if_0censorship-in-facebook-copyfacebook-chained-censorship_crfacebook-creating-censorship-for-chinatwitter-censorship-may-backfire_cr_crmilo-in-twitter-alternative_craccount-suspended-alternativestwitter-deleting-accounts-1trump-censored-by-twittermuslims-tweet-child-porntwitter-suspends-account-for-revealing-child-porntwitter-double-standardsconservatives-suspended-muslims-free-passmuslim-brotherhood-in-twitter_crsaudi-prince-owns-twitterwhat-google-chrome-is-doing-to-gab-copyphoto-from-video-truth-about-fake-newsTO WATCH THE VIDEO CLICK HERE

 

THE INTERNET ESTABLISHMENT IS READY TO KILL THE NEW MEDIA

THE INTERNET ESTABLISHMENT IS READY TO KILL THE NEW MEDIA

 

definition-of-censorshipdisclaimer123456720161122_if_0censorship-in-facebook-copyfacebook-chained-censorship_crfacebook-creating-censorship-for-chinatwitter-censorship-may-backfire_cr_crmilo-in-twitter-alternative_craccount-suspended-alternativestwitter-deleting-accounts-1trump-censored-by-twittermuslims-tweet-child-porntwitter-suspends-account-for-revealing-child-porntwitter-double-standardsconservatives-suspended-muslims-free-passmuslim-brotherhood-in-twitter_crsaudi-prince-owns-twitterwhat-google-chrome-is-doing-to-gab-copyphoto-from-video-truth-about-fake-newsTO WATCH THE VIDEO CLICK HERE

 

Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg Tests Total Censorship Tool in China to be Deployed Soon Across USA

Zuckerberg Is A Complete Chinese Sellout. Boycott Facebook / Zuckerberg now. (nytimes.com)

submitted 12 hours ago by kinneys to news (+119|-5)

Why Google Search Results Favor Democrats

Why Google Search Results Favor Democrats

It’s not just because the company is biased—it’s more complicated.

 
Bernie Sanders media republicans.
His search results are off the charts! Democratic Presidential candidate Bernie Sanders speaks in Manchester, New Hampshire, Nov. 29, 2015.

Photo by Darren McCollester/Getty Images

This article is part of Future Tense, a collaboration among Arizona State University, New America, and Slate. On Thursday, Dec. 10, Future Tense will host a three-hour conversation on “The Tyranny of Algorithms” in Washington, D.C. For more information and to RSVP, visit the New America website.

As early as 2010, researchers at Harvard University started finding evidence that Google’s search rankings were not so objective, favoring its own products over those of competitors. A Federal Trade Commission investigation into the conglomerate in 2012 also indicated evidence that the company was using its monopoly power to help its own businesses. So it’s no secret that Google search results aren’t a font of objective and unbiased information. Now, as we enter into prime-time politics season in the U.S., the searching for candidates is heating up.  So what do Google’s biased search results mean for the election and for democracy itself?

Google is not fair; it favors some candidates, and it opposes others. And so far, it seems to prefer Democrats.

Our crowdsourced analysis of Google search results on Dec. 1 for the names of 16 presidential candidates revealed that Democrats fared better than Republicans when it came to supportive and positive sites within the first page of results. Democrats had, on average, seven favorable search results in those top 10, whereas GOP candidates had only 5.9.

To be clear, we’re not suggesting that Google is a digital arm of the Democratic Party. But our analysis clearly shows biases and differences in the results surfaced around the various candidates. Could those biases be caused by a single rabid software engineer? Possible, but highly unlikely. The bias is more probably an organic, emergent result constituted from a complex prism of quantification involving hundreds of signals and increasingly complex and opaque artificial intelligence. But if this is happening “organically” as the Google algorithms respond to various inputs, maybe it’s high time to rein in or at least double-check how this new actor in the democracy is behaving.

Our data was collected by automatically gathering nonpersonalized search results from Google for each candidate’s full name, focusing on the top 10 result links and excluding advertisements. The first page of results is important because that’s where users end up clicking 7 out of 10 times. Next, we asked our crowdsourced raters to evaluate each website on two scales: one that measures its favorability toward a candidate and another to gauge its opposition to him or her. For each candidate, some websites are completely supportive, some are completely against, and some have a little bit of both. We validated the method against our own careful coding on a subset of data and found the crowdsource workers to be accurate. It’s worth saying that we collected results in D.C., but we know geography can affect nonpersonalized search results,so we’ll be looking to collect results in other parts of the country in the future to see how they vary.

Another pattern in our data is that candidates tended to dip in favorability as you move down in the rankings. On average, candidates’ first results have a 2.2 on our positivity score, which runs from 4 (most positive) to -4 (most negative). By the 10th ranked result, the average score drops to 0.9. That’s because the negative results tend to show up in the bottom, after the official websites and social networking profiles. This is significant in light of a 2007 study published in the Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication showing that people also trust results that appear higher in the Google search results more.

Google election 1.

Chart by Daniel Trielli, Sean Mussenden, and Nicholas Diakopoulos

Notice that this metric changes according to party. Democrats start higher than Republicans and drop off at a slower rate. And then there are the outliers like Chris Christie. He has a negative result ranked first: That’s where 31 percent of organic clicks are. If voters are looking for information with Web searches and can be swayed by what they see, that kind of bad result early on in a high-traffic rank can affect the electorate’s perception of a candidate. It’s not clear whether these kinds of results could predict changes in the race.

 

Comparing contenders for each party is telling. Donald Trump had four positive and three negative search results on the first page. Hillary Clinton had five positive results and only one negative on the first page. Ted Cruz had more negative results than anyone else, and Bernie Sanders was the king of positivity—with nine “very pro” results and not a single negative. Of course, all of this could change tomorrow—though we did get substantially similar results when we ran the same experiment two weeks earlier.

Google Search 2.

Chart by Daniel Trielli, Sean Mussenden, and Nicholas Diakopoulos

The favorable sites are mostly run by the campaigns, including official congressional sites and social media profiles. The negative results tend to be news articles that are critical of the candidates. So why is Google surfacing more negative news stories about Republican candidates? And why do unflattering websites for other candidates not show up?

Having a big social presence is key. Sanders’ search results include a Facebook profile, his Twitter feed, and his YouTube account. Add three links from his websites and a neutral Wikipedia page about him, and there is only room for three news stories, one from the Huffington Post, one from the Washington Post, and the last from Time, all of which are favorable to Sanders. Cruz, on the other hand, has only one Facebook account and his two websites. The rest of his results are his Wikipedia profile (slightly positive) and a wave of news coverage that is predominantly negative.

Google search 3.

Chart by Daniel Trielli, Sean Mussenden, and Nicholas Diakopoulos

Some of these campaigns are paying close attention to search engine optimization. The Sanders digital strategy is led by D.C. company Revolution Messaging. An article on its website specifically mentions how social networking affects search results. “The greater your reach on social media, the more often your article or site will pop up higher in searches,” it says. “It is important that political campaigns and advocacy organizations institute both a defensive and offensive strategy when it comes to SEO. Do you monitor issues that matter to you, and where your organization is ranked on them?”

This is all consequential because search engines have the power to affect elections. In a study published last August in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Robert Epstein and Ronald E. Robertson write that “biased search rankings can shift the voting preferences of undecided voters by 20% or more.” Their sequence of studies showed that biased rankings in a hypothetical search engine could sway voters, and moreover, that the vast majority of those voters didn’t even notice the bias. 

Without a doubt, the Internet is a growing force in shaping the political debate. More than half of adults in the United States went online to get information about the midterm elections in 2010, according to a Pew study. For 24 percent of adults, the Internet was the main source of campaign news, and that was five years ago. The Epstein study reported that 86 percent of participants used a search engine to learn about political candidates. In the U.S., that means Google, mostly, with 63.9 percent of the market, distantly followed by Bing (20.8 percent) and Yahoo (12.5 percent), according to comScore.

And there’s the illusion of neutrality. About two-thirds of Americans who use search engines believe they are completely unbiased, according to a 2012 Pew study. The study showed that “73 percent of search engine users say that most or all the information they find as they use search engines is accurate and trustworthy.” Search engines are more trusted than the news media itself.

We’ve shown that, even in their nonpersonalized incarnation, Google search results are biased in ways that could affect access to political information leading up to the 2016 U.S. elections. All of this adds up: The public needs to be more aware of search engine bias when getting political information, and Google itself needs to acknowledge its power and take an active role in benchmarking results around certain political queries—candidates as well as issues. Google should be applauded for its efforts in publishing a transparency report, which includes various useful disclosures about takedown requests and censorship. But those disclosures should be expanded to include more information about its own products, including how Google ranks and provides access to political information both in the U.S. and around the world.

The Most Corrupt Politicians In The World call THE TRUTH: “fake news”

Merkel Declares War On “Fake News” As Europe Brands Russia’s RT, Sputnik “Dangerous Propaganda” (zerohedge.com)

submitted 2.6 hours ago by bdmthrfkr to politics (+37|-0)